| | | |
WAKE FOREST FLORIDA ST |
|
| 139 | 76 Final 82 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
731 | WAKE FOREST | 139 | 139 | 732 | FLORIDA ST | -4 | -4.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 9-11 | -2.6 | 9-5 | 7-4 | 70.5 | 34.1 | 42.7% | 40.0 | 69.4 | 31.3 | 44.1% | 33.0 | Road Games | 2-5 | 0 | 5-2 | 3-3 | 63.4 | 30.3 | 39.9% | 39.3 | 68.7 | 31.1 | 43.2% | 35.7 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 70.4 | 33.0 | 42.7% | 38.8 | 74.8 | 32.8 | 45.3% | 37.2 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -4 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 70.4 | 32.6 | 43.5% | 37.3 | 76.7 | 34.4 | 47.1% | 37.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.5 | 34.1 | 24-57 | 42.7% | 6-17 | 32.7% | 17-26 | 64.3% | 40 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 30.4 | 23-55 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 14-20 | 69.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.4 | 30.3 | 23-58 | 39.9% | 6-18 | 31.0% | 12-19 | 61.7% | 39 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 16 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.4 | 31.3 | 25-57 | 44.1% | 6-20 | 30.8% | 13-21 | 64.0% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 9 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 70.5 | 33.4 | 25-56 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 34.3% | 14-20 | 68.1% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.7 | 31.1 | 24-57 | 43.2% | 5-18 | 25.6% | 15-24 | 63.1% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 10 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-10 | -5.6 | 7-10 | 6-5 | 68.9 | 31.5 | 46.4% | 35.0 | 68.5 | 31.4 | 42.1% | 33.0 | Home Games | 8-3 | -1.8 | 4-4 | 3-1 | 73.5 | 34.1 | 49.8% | 35.4 | 66.6 | 31.5 | 40.7% | 31.1 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.3 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 63.4 | 28.6 | 42.0% | 33.4 | 69.6 | 33.4 | 42.0% | 36.6 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -1.3 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 66.6 | 32.3 | 43.0% | 35.1 | 72.3 | 35.7 | 43.4% | 34.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.9 | 31.5 | 24-52 | 46.4% | 4-14 | 27.4% | 16-25 | 66.3% | 35 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30.4 | 23-55 | 41.9% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.5 | 34.1 | 26-51 | 49.8% | 4-14 | 26.8% | 18-28 | 66.2% | 35 | 8 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.5 | 31.4 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 14-20 | 70.7% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 32.6 | 24-55 | 44.6% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 14-20 | 68.1% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.6 | 31.5 | 23-57 | 40.7% | 7-22 | 32.6% | 13-19 | 70.6% | 31 | 9 | 11 | 23 | 5 | 14 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WAKE FOREST 76.5, FLORIDA ST 76.2 |
| | |
|
|
12/14/2014 | SAMFORD | 86-68 | W | -18 | T | | - | 30-61 | 49.2% | 42 | 13 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 26 | 18 | 12/20/2014 | *FLORIDA | 50-63 | L | 14 | W | 125 | U | 17-46 | 37.0% | 36 | 24 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 31 | 15 | 12/22/2014 | BUCKNELL | 60-53 | W | | - | | - | 17-47 | 36.2% | 41 | 13 | 14-49 | 28.6% | 35 | 16 | 12/28/2014 | @ RICHMOND | 65-63 | W | 6 | W | 123 | O | 25-58 | 43.1% | 37 | 13 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 33 | 10 | 12/31/2014 | PRINCETON | 80-66 | W | -4.5 | W | | - | 26-61 | 42.6% | 45 | 10 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 27 | 8 | 1/4/2015 | LOUISVILLE | 76-85 | L | 12.5 | W | 130 | O | 28-53 | 52.8% | 36 | 12 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 35 | 7 | 1/7/2015 | DUKE | 65-73 | L | 15 | W | 145 | U | 28-61 | 45.9% | 31 | 11 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 39 | 14 | 1/10/2015 | GEORGIA TECH | 76-69 | W | -3 | W | 132.5 | O | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 17 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 29 | 12 | 1/13/2015 | @ SYRACUSE | 83-86 | L | 9.5 | W | 133.5 | O | 30-62 | 48.4% | 43 | 13 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 39 | 8 | 1/21/2015 | N CAROLINA | 71-87 | L | 8 | L | 147.5 | O | 24-60 | 40.0% | 34 | 14 | 35-58 | 60.3% | 36 | 12 | 1/24/2015 | @ CLEMSON | 57-59 | L | 5 | W | 127 | U | 19-61 | 31.1% | 45 | 10 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 43 | 7 | 1/28/2015 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2015 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/13/2014 | @ NOTRE DAME | 63-83 | L | 10.5 | L | 141 | O | 25-63 | 39.7% | 37 | 10 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 36 | 5 | 12/17/2014 | N FLORIDA | 93-77 | W | | - | | - | 34-58 | 58.6% | 38 | 15 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 27 | 12 | 12/20/2014 | *S FLORIDA | 75-62 | W | -6 | W | | - | 26-53 | 49.1% | 39 | 16 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 37 | 14 | 12/22/2014 | STETSON | 63-59 | W | | - | | - | 23-49 | 46.9% | 35 | 16 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 38 | 16 | 12/30/2014 | FLORIDA | 65-63 | W | 7 | W | 126 | O | 21-53 | 39.6% | 38 | 15 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 17 | 1/2/2015 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | 55-62 | L | -2 | L | 126 | U | 19-43 | 44.2% | 30 | 19 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 28 | 12 | 1/6/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | 86-75 | W | -9.5 | W | 131.5 | O | 27-52 | 51.9% | 42 | 14 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 22 | 6 | 1/11/2015 | @ SYRACUSE | 57-70 | L | 10 | L | 128.5 | U | 21-53 | 39.6% | 35 | 13 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 39 | 8 | 1/14/2015 | @ PITTSBURGH | 64-73 | L | 6.5 | L | 126.5 | O | 21-51 | 41.2% | 31 | 7 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 39 | 6 | 1/17/2015 | NC STATE | 63-72 | L | 1 | L | 138.5 | U | 19-51 | 37.3% | 34 | 12 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 38 | 14 | 1/19/2015 | @ CLEMSON | 59-55 | W | 4.5 | W | 124.5 | U | 22-46 | 47.8% | 32 | 16 | 17-50 | 34.0% | 31 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | @ N CAROLINA | 74-78 | L | 14.5 | W | 145 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 35 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 5 | 1/28/2015 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2015 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2015 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | WAKE FOREST: One advantage for the Demon Deacons is that they have their top two scorers back from last season's team. PG Codi Miller-McIntyre (12.6 PPG, 4.2 APG, 3.0 RPG) and C Devin Thomas (11.1 PPG, 7.5 RPG) are a very good inside-outside duo, allowing Wake Forest to play many different styles of games. For Miller-McIntyre, he must improve on his shooting from the outside, as he knocked down only 20% from the three-point line. Thomas is relentless on the glass, and he will have to continue to do that against some of the top ACC post players. This is a team that will really look for those two to score, with redshirt freshman SF Greg McClinton hopefully being the third leading scorer on the team led by new head coach Danny Manning. | | FLORIDA ST: The Seminoles struggled last season, but showed some potential last March when they reached the NIT Final Four. Florida State brings back its starting backcourt, led by SG Aaron Thomas (14.5 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 37% threes). Thomas is a difficult matchup because he can use his quickness to drive around defenders or use his 6-foot-5 frame to take smaller guards into the post for easy baskets. With Ian Miller graduated, this is now Thomas' team. PG Devin Bookert (8.5 PPG, 3.2 RPG) actually shot better from behind the three-point arc (43% threes) than he did overall (42% FG), but needs to be a better distributor (2.8 APG) for this team to move up the ACC standings. SG Montay Brandon (7.7 PPG, 4.9 RPG), 7-foot-3 C Boris Bojanovsky (5.9 PPG, 4.0 RPG, 1.9 BPG) and 7-foot-1 C Michael Ojo (2.5 PPG, 3.0 RPG in 11.0 MPG) are three guys that will play a big role in determining if the Seminoles can get back to the NCAA's for the first time since 2012. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/7/2024 10:47:10 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|