| | | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
MARYLAND
FLORIDA ST |
|
|
139.5
| 61
Final
85 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 837 | MARYLAND | +10.5 | Over 134.5 | | 838 | FLORIDA ST | -2.5 | Under 142.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-6 | +0.6 | 7-5 | 7-5 | 73.6 | 33.6 | 44.5% | 39.1 | 67.7 | 33.2 | 41.1% | 32.7 | | Road Games | 4-4 | -1.4 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 70.4 | 31.9 | 42.4% | 37.9 | 68.9 | 34.4 | 42.6% | 34.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 73.6 | 33.6 | 43.8% | 39.6 | 70.6 | 32.4 | 40.9% | 33.6 | | Conference Games | 2-1 | +1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 74.7 | 38.3 | 46.0% | 33.0 | 73.3 | 33.7 | 46.4% | 33.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 73.6 | 33.6 | 26-59 | 44.5% | 7-19 | 37.1% | 14-22 | 65.4% | 39 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 68.1 | 31.1 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 14-21 | 68.9% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.4 | 31.9 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 6-19 | 32.2% | 14-21 | 66.9% | 38 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.7 | 33.2 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 6-18 | 35.7% | 15-21 | 71.3% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 72.1 | 34.1 | 25-56 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 16-23 | 70.4% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.9 | 34.4 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 17-24 | 71.4% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-4 | +3.7 | 9-3 | 2-8 | 73.6 | 34.1 | 47.4% | 38.3 | 62.5 | 28.1 | 36.5% | 34.8 | | Home Games | 5-1 | -0.6 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 80.0 | 36.7 | 49.7% | 37.7 | 60.7 | 26.8 | 36.3% | 32.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.7 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 67.8 | 30.0 | 43.7% | 39.8 | 55.8 | 25.2 | 33.5% | 36.2 | | Conference Games | 1-1 | -0.3 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 53.0 | 19.0 | 39.3% | 35.5 | 51.5 | 23.0 | 31.5% | 37.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 73.6 | 34.1 | 26-55 | 47.4% | 4-13 | 31.2% | 17-24 | 70.2% | 38 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 67.7 | 31.9 | 24-56 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 68.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.0 | 36.7 | 27-55 | 49.7% | 6-17 | 35.6% | 19-26 | 72.3% | 38 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.5 | 28.1 | 21-58 | 36.5% | 6-18 | 30.8% | 14-22 | 65.2% | 35 | 11 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 73.6 | 34.5 | 25-57 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 35.4% | 16-23 | 68.8% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 60.7 | 26.8 | 21-57 | 36.3% | 6-19 | 31.9% | 13-21 | 62.9% | 32 | 11 | 10 | 22 | 5 | 17 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MARYLAND 73.7, FLORIDA ST 75.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 11/24/2013 | *N IOWA | 80-66 | W | -5 | W | 143.5 | O | 29-60 | 48.3% | 37 | 8 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 33 | 14 | | 11/25/2013 | *PROVIDENCE | 56-52 | W | 1.5 | W | 142 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 45 | 11 | 16-59 | 27.1% | 38 | 11 | | 11/29/2013 | MORGAN ST | 89-62 | W | | - | | - | 33-53 | 62.3% | 41 | 18 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 30 | 14 | | 12/4/2013 | @ OHIO ST | 60-76 | L | 10 | L | 136.5 | U | 25-64 | 39.1% | 44 | 14 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 30 | 11 | | 12/8/2013 | *GEORGE WASHINGTON | 75-77 | L | -2.5 | L | 142.5 | O | 25-64 | 39.1% | 36 | 18 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 38 | 19 | | 12/12/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 88-80 | W | -1.5 | W | 144 | O | 32-58 | 55.2% | 29 | 11 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 28 | 9 | | 12/14/2013 | FLA ATLANTIC | 66-62 | W | -18 | L | 142.5 | U | 25-63 | 39.7% | 40 | 9 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 33 | 13 | | 12/21/2013 | BOSTON U | 77-83 | L | | - | | - | 28-58 | 48.3% | 42 | 17 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 34 | 12 | | 12/29/2013 | TULSA | 85-74 | W | -10 | W | 144.5 | O | 26-60 | 43.3% | 43 | 10 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 34 | 10 | | 12/31/2013 | NC CENTRAL | 70-56 | W | | - | | - | 22-49 | 44.9% | 43 | 16 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 28 | 7 | | 1/4/2014 | GEORGIA TECH | 77-61 | W | -8.5 | W | 140 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 34 | 6 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 11 | | 1/6/2014 | @ PITTSBURGH | 59-79 | L | 9 | L | 135.5 | O | 20-56 | 35.7% | 36 | 13 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 36 | 7 | | 1/12/2014 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2014 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/20/2014 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2014 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2014 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2014 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 11/24/2013 | *NORTHEASTERN | 62-60 | W | -12 | L | 146.5 | U | 23-60 | 38.3% | 33 | 10 | 23-49 | 46.9% | 37 | 18 | | 11/29/2013 | @ FLORIDA | 66-67 | L | 8 | W | 138 | U | 22-52 | 42.3% | 37 | 12 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 38 | 9 | | 12/3/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 61-71 | L | 3.5 | L | 146 | U | 20-43 | 46.5% | 36 | 17 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 32 | 6 | | 12/8/2013 | JACKSONVILLE ST | 77-53 | W | -20.5 | W | | - | 24-44 | 54.5% | 30 | 15 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 27 | 16 | | 12/17/2013 | CHARLOTTE | 106-62 | W | -9 | W | 146 | O | 39-72 | 54.2% | 45 | 9 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 33 | 19 | | 12/21/2013 | *MASSACHUSETTS | 60-55 | W | -3 | W | 157 | U | 24-65 | 36.9% | 47 | 17 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 43 | 17 | | 12/30/2013 | CHARLESTON SO | 67-59 | W | | - | | - | 26-56 | 46.4% | 36 | 14 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 30 | 17 | | 1/4/2014 | VIRGINIA | 50-62 | L | -3.5 | L | 124 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 38 | 16 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 41 | 6 | | 1/9/2014 | @ CLEMSON | 56-41 | W | 3 | W | 122 | U | 26-55 | 47.3% | 33 | 11 | 15-50 | 30.0% | 34 | 18 | | 1/12/2014 | MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2014 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2014 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2014 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2014 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2014 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |  | MARYLAND: This will be a new-look Maryland squad without center Alex Len, who took his talents to the NBA. Heading into the school's final year in the ACC, Dez Wells (13.1 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 3.0 APG) should lead the charge, even more so with Pe'Shon Howard transferring. The key for this team will be the development of two sophomores in Charles Mitchell (5.5 PPG, 5.4 RPG in 15.7 MPG) and Shaquille Cleare (3.7 PPG, 2.7 RPG in 12.0 MPG), who will be tasked with replacing Len in the paint. Cleare is a hefty 6-foot-9 center, who has the potential to be a load to deal with down low. Mitchell made the most of his limited time as a freshman, and also provides a hefty rebounding presence that could prove difficult for opponents to deal with. Sophomore Seth Allen (7.8 PPG, 2.3 APG) and freshman Roddy Peters will be tasked with running the point, which will allow junior Nick Faust (9.4 PPG, 3.7 RPG, 2.5 APG) to concentrate more on scoring from the two-guard spot. | | FLORIDA ST: The Seminoles lose their best player from last year, Michael Snaer, but return a veteran crew that should be able to improve on a mediocre 2012-13 campaign. Okaro White (12.4 PPG, 5.9 RPG) may prove to be among the more dynamic big men in the ACC while Devon Bookert (6.5 PPG, 53% 3-pt FT) is an emerging star in the backcourt. Ian Miller (5.3 PPG in 18.8 MPG) should also play a big role in filling Snaer's wing position. The biggest question mark will be at the center position, but the team is hoping one of its three raw 7-footers (Kiel Turpin, Boris Bojanovsky and Michael Ojo) can provide a consistently strong presence in the paint. |
| | |
| | Last Updated: 10/4/2024 11:30:40 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|