|
|
BOSTON COLLEGE FLORIDA ST |
|
|
| 66 Final 69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
509 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | 510 | FLORIDA ST | -5.5 | -5.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-13 | -4.2 | 11-9 | 5-2 | 67.1 | 31.5 | 43.5% | 31.9 | 67.9 | 31.2 | 44.8% | 32.8 | Road Games | 2-7 | -3.6 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 67.0 | 31.1 | 42.1% | 30.4 | 72.7 | 31.2 | 49.3% | 34.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 64.4 | 29.8 | 45.2% | 25.8 | 69.4 | 32.8 | 45.4% | 33.6 | Conference Games | 3-8 | -3.6 | 6-5 | 2-2 | 65.6 | 29.8 | 43.0% | 28.5 | 69.5 | 30.5 | 47.0% | 33.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.1 | 31.5 | 23-52 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 34.0% | 15-21 | 70.9% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.3 | 30.3 | 23-56 | 41.8% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 13-18 | 68.9% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.0 | 31.1 | 22-53 | 42.1% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 15-21 | 69.5% | 30 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.9 | 31.2 | 25-55 | 44.8% | 7-18 | 37.6% | 12-17 | 69.7% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.9 | 31.9 | 24-55 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 14-20 | 68.6% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.7 | 31.2 | 27-55 | 49.3% | 8-18 | 42.2% | 11-16 | 66.2% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-11 | -9 | 9-12 | 7-5 | 67.2 | 30.7 | 43.9% | 31.3 | 67.5 | 32.9 | 43.3% | 34.4 | Home Games | 6-7 | -12.6 | 2-8 | 3-3 | 69.2 | 30.1 | 43.5% | 29.9 | 68.2 | 32.5 | 45.7% | 32.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.2 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 60.6 | 27.6 | 43.3% | 25.0 | 69.8 | 35.0 | 52.0% | 30.8 | Conference Games | 5-6 | -0.3 | 3-7 | 1-4 | 59.5 | 27.1 | 41.5% | 26.6 | 67.1 | 33.5 | 46.6% | 34.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.2 | 30.7 | 23-52 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 35.2% | 15-21 | 71.8% | 31 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.4 | 29.6 | 23-56 | 40.5% | 6-18 | 32.8% | 12-18 | 67.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.2 | 30.1 | 23-53 | 43.5% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 17-23 | 75.9% | 30 | 9 | 11 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.5 | 32.9 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 7-19 | 35.5% | 13-19 | 67.0% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.6 | 31.9 | 25-55 | 44.6% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 13-20 | 67.6% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 68.2 | 32.5 | 25-54 | 45.7% | 7-18 | 35.9% | 12-17 | 70.9% | 32 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: BOSTON COLLEGE 73.3, FLORIDA ST 75.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/29/2012 | HOLY CROSS | 70-60 | W | | - | | - | 22-47 | 46.8% | 32 | 11 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 31 | 10 | 12/31/2012 | DARTMOUTH | 79-58 | W | -12 | W | | - | 27-56 | 48.2% | 36 | 11 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 29 | 11 | 1/5/2013 | NC STATE | 73-78 | L | 7.5 | W | 146.5 | O | 21-51 | 41.2% | 31 | 8 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 32 | 7 | 1/9/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 86-75 | W | 3 | W | | - | 29-60 | 48.3% | 33 | 5 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 34 | 17 | 1/12/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | 72-75 | L | 2 | L | | - | 20-48 | 41.7% | 32 | 17 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 31 | 12 | 1/16/2013 | MIAMI | 59-60 | L | 6 | W | | - | 20-46 | 43.5% | 31 | 10 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 30 | 6 | 1/22/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 59-64 | L | 8.5 | W | 133.5 | U | 20-56 | 35.7% | 34 | 10 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 14 | 1/26/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 51-65 | L | 9 | L | | - | 17-47 | 36.2% | 23 | 14 | 27-48 | 56.2% | 29 | 13 | 1/29/2013 | N CAROLINA | 70-82 | L | 4 | L | 146.5 | O | 25-56 | 44.6% | 26 | 10 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 37 | 9 | 2/2/2013 | CLEMSON | 75-68 | W | -1 | W | | - | 26-45 | 57.8% | 21 | 14 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 34 | 15 | 2/5/2013 | @ MIAMI | 50-72 | L | 13.5 | L | | - | 20-54 | 37.0% | 30 | 11 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 42 | 11 | 2/10/2013 | DUKE | 61-62 | L | 11 | W | 142 | U | 21-47 | 44.7% | 28 | 12 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 28 | 13 | 2/13/2013 | WAKE FOREST | 66-63 | W | -5.5 | L | | - | 21-48 | 43.7% | 24 | 11 | 24-47 | 51.1% | 27 | 17 | 2/16/2013 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2013 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/29/2012 | *TULSA | 81-63 | W | -11 | W | 135.5 | O | 29-63 | 46.0% | 43 | 13 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 32 | 17 | 1/2/2013 | @ AUBURN | 72-78 | L | -4 | L | 136 | O | 28-58 | 48.3% | 40 | 20 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 42 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | @ CLEMSON | 71-66 | W | 3 | W | | - | 25-53 | 47.2% | 33 | 14 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 37 | 13 | 1/9/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 65-62 | W | 6.5 | W | | - | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 13 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 42 | 18 | 1/12/2013 | N CAROLINA | 72-77 | L | -3 | L | 152.5 | U | 24-50 | 48.0% | 19 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 41 | 14 | 1/19/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 36-56 | L | 6 | L | | - | 16-43 | 37.2% | 22 | 18 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 30 | 16 | 1/24/2013 | CLEMSON | 60-57 | W | -4.5 | L | | - | 19-46 | 41.3% | 23 | 15 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 34 | 13 | 1/27/2013 | @ MIAMI | 47-71 | L | 9.5 | L | 129 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 32 | 12 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 44 | 8 | 1/30/2013 | MARYLAND | 73-71 | W | -3 | L | | - | 22-48 | 45.8% | 20 | 6 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 36 | 16 | 2/2/2013 | DUKE | 60-79 | L | 6.5 | L | 143.5 | U | 23-55 | 41.8% | 24 | 11 | 31-51 | 60.8% | 27 | 10 | 2/5/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 56-54 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 20-40 | 50.0% | 30 | 16 | 19-50 | 38.0% | 24 | 11 | 2/9/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | 46-71 | L | -2.5 | L | 139.5 | U | 14-43 | 32.6% | 25 | 17 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 45 | 14 | 2/13/2013 | MIAMI | 68-74 | L | 6 | T | 126.5 | O | 24-52 | 46.2% | 26 | 17 | 30-47 | 63.8% | 22 | 16 | 2/16/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/26/2013 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2013 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| BOSTON COLLEGE: The ACC cellar dwellers last year averaged an abysmal 59.1 points per game (323rd in nation) and will need sophomore Ryan Anderson to take a big step in his second year of college ball after leading the team with 11.2 PPG and 7.4 RPG last year. Freshman Olivier Hanlan will be asked to run the point. | | FLORIDA ST: After a strong ACC showing last year (12-4 record), the Seminoles were bounced in the Round of 32 in the Big Dance. Although Leonard Hamilton's squad returns just one starter, it is the most important one'senior guard Michael Snaer (14.0 PPG, 3.8 RPG), who made 40% of his shots from deep. Ian Miller (10.3 PPG) joins him in the backcourt, where they will also receive help from freshman Montay Brandon, who at 6-foot-7 should be ready to contribute from day one. The question is if the return of Terrance Shannon, who played just seven games last season due to a shoulder injury, to the frontcourt can make up for the loss of bigs Bernard James and Xavier Gibson, who did all the dirty work for Hamilton last year. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/19/2024 4:59:47 PM EST. |
|
|