| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
TEXAS A&M FLORIDA |
|
| 123 | 62 Final 66 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
547 | TEXAS A&M | +9 | Over 118.5 | 548 | FLORIDA | -1 | Under 126.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 20-8 | +10.3 | 16-10 | 11-12 | 67.9 | 31.0 | 45.6% | 36.2 | 62.0 | 29.5 | 39.6% | 31.8 | Road Games | 7-6 | +2.4 | 8-5 | 6-7 | 63.9 | 28.7 | 43.9% | 35.1 | 62.9 | 31.2 | 40.8% | 31.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.4 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 69.6 | 31.8 | 44.1% | 39.6 | 62.4 | 32.4 | 40.1% | 30.6 | Conference Games | 11-5 | +7.4 | 11-5 | 8-8 | 66.3 | 30.8 | 43.9% | 37.3 | 62.7 | 30.2 | 39.1% | 32.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.9 | 31.0 | 25-54 | 45.6% | 5-15 | 35.3% | 13-21 | 64.9% | 36 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30.6 | 23-54 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 14-20 | 68.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.9 | 28.7 | 23-53 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 34.8% | 12-18 | 68.2% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.0 | 29.5 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 7-22 | 30.0% | 13-19 | 70.5% | 32 | 8 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.4 | 32 | 24-54 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 15-21 | 69.3% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 62.9 | 31.2 | 21-52 | 40.8% | 6-21 | 28.3% | 14-20 | 71.8% | 31 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 14-15 | -26.7 | 10-16 | 18-10 | 64.4 | 32.1 | 43.5% | 33.5 | 59.6 | 27.0 | 40.8% | 31.9 | Home Games | 10-5 | -14.2 | 6-7 | 8-6 | 66.5 | 34.8 | 46.6% | 34.1 | 55.1 | 25.1 | 38.8% | 30.4 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.7 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 58.6 | 28.8 | 41.6% | 34.6 | 58.6 | 27.8 | 41.2% | 30.8 | Conference Games | 7-9 | -13.1 | 7-9 | 11-5 | 62.3 | 31.6 | 42.9% | 32.1 | 61.9 | 28.5 | 42.4% | 31.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 64.4 | 32.1 | 24-54 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 32.2% | 11-16 | 64.4% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.3 | 30.3 | 23-55 | 41.1% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 13-20 | 68.4% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 66.5 | 34.8 | 25-53 | 46.6% | 7-20 | 35.3% | 10-15 | 62.3% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 14 | 8 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.6 | 27.0 | 20-50 | 40.8% | 5-16 | 33.0% | 14-19 | 74.0% | 32 | 7 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.1 | 24-55 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 15-21 | 70.1% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 55.1 | 25.1 | 20-51 | 38.8% | 5-17 | 33.1% | 10-14 | 75.2% | 30 | 7 | 9 | 15 | 5 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TEXAS A&M 77.4, FLORIDA 77 |
| | |
|
|
1/13/2015 | MISSISSIPPI ST | 74-70 | W | -10 | L | 117 | O | 21-44 | 47.7% | 34 | 13 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 36 | 14 | 1/17/2015 | @ LSU | 67-64 | W | 5 | W | 135.5 | U | 27-65 | 41.5% | 41 | 13 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 40 | 16 | 1/21/2015 | MISSOURI | 62-50 | W | -9 | W | 125.5 | U | 20-47 | 42.6% | 37 | 12 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 24 | 14 | 1/24/2015 | @ TENNESSEE | 67-61 | W | 3.5 | W | 121 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 34 | 9 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 27 | 9 | 1/27/2015 | @ AUBURN | 71-61 | W | -2.5 | W | 129 | O | 28-56 | 50.0% | 36 | 8 | 15-44 | 34.1% | 29 | 10 | 1/31/2015 | VANDERBILT | 69-58 | W | -5 | W | 126.5 | O | 25-47 | 53.2% | 32 | 15 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 23 | 16 | 2/4/2015 | @ OLE MISS | 59-69 | L | 5.5 | L | 136 | U | 22-57 | 38.6% | 42 | 16 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 39 | 8 | 2/7/2015 | @ MISSOURI | 83-61 | W | -3.5 | W | 119.5 | O | 33-56 | 58.9% | 27 | 7 | 21-48 | 43.7% | 26 | 13 | 2/11/2015 | GEORGIA | 53-62 | L | -5 | L | 129 | U | 19-47 | 40.4% | 31 | 13 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 33 | 7 | 2/14/2015 | FLORIDA | 63-62 | W | -2 | L | 123 | O | 25-55 | 45.5% | 34 | 8 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 32 | 9 | 2/17/2015 | LSU | 68-62 | W | -2.5 | W | 134 | U | 25-55 | 45.5% | 38 | 13 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 31 | 13 | 2/21/2015 | @ S CAROLINA | 62-52 | W | 3 | W | 123.5 | U | 17-43 | 39.5% | 38 | 14 | 16-59 | 27.1% | 37 | 11 | 2/24/2015 | @ ARKANSAS | 75-81 | L | 7.5 | W | 139.5 | O | 26-61 | 42.6% | 44 | 21 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 23 | 10 | 2/28/2015 | AUBURN | 80-55 | W | -12 | W | 137.5 | U | 27-58 | 46.6% | 44 | 9 | 17-48 | 35.4% | 30 | 9 | 3/3/2015 | @ FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/15/2015 | AUBURN | 75-55 | W | -15.5 | W | 127.5 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 39 | 9 | 16-49 | 32.7% | 35 | 13 | 1/17/2015 | @ GEORGIA | 61-73 | L | -2 | L | 125 | O | 24-48 | 50.0% | 26 | 19 | 23-41 | 56.1% | 26 | 16 | 1/20/2015 | LSU | 61-79 | L | -11 | L | 135 | O | 23-60 | 38.3% | 30 | 13 | 27-52 | 51.9% | 35 | 16 | 1/24/2015 | @ OLE MISS | 71-72 | L | -1 | L | 135.5 | O | 22-46 | 47.8% | 29 | 13 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 30 | 9 | 1/27/2015 | @ ALABAMA | 52-50 | W | -1.5 | W | 123.5 | U | 20-46 | 43.5% | 28 | 16 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 30 | 17 | 1/31/2015 | ARKANSAS | 57-56 | W | -6.5 | L | 141 | U | 18-52 | 34.6% | 39 | 14 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 36 | 16 | 2/3/2015 | @ VANDERBILT | 61-67 | L | -2.5 | L | 124.5 | O | 21-57 | 36.8% | 26 | 8 | 16-40 | 40.0% | 42 | 18 | 2/7/2015 | KENTUCKY | 61-68 | L | 8 | W | 117 | O | 24-49 | 49.0% | 20 | 11 | 22-47 | 46.8% | 33 | 15 | 2/12/2015 | OLE MISS | 61-62 | L | -5 | L | 134 | U | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 8 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 36 | 9 | 2/14/2015 | @ TEXAS A&M | 62-63 | L | 2 | W | 123 | O | 26-59 | 44.1% | 32 | 9 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 34 | 8 | 2/18/2015 | VANDERBILT | 50-47 | W | -5 | L | 124 | U | 18-50 | 36.0% | 41 | 13 | 17-51 | 33.3% | 31 | 12 | 2/21/2015 | @ LSU | 63-70 | L | 5 | L | 129 | O | 24-68 | 35.3% | 42 | 15 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 36 | 15 | 2/24/2015 | @ MISSOURI | 52-64 | L | -6.5 | L | 121.5 | U | 19-48 | 39.6% | 31 | 10 | 19-44 | 43.2% | 34 | 9 | 2/28/2015 | TENNESSEE | 66-49 | W | -6.5 | W | 114.5 | O | 24-42 | 57.1% | 27 | 13 | 20-45 | 44.4% | 19 | 14 | 3/3/2015 | TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | @ KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | TEXAS A&M: The Aggies have struggled since joining the SEC, and it may be tough for them to get things going this season. There are some quality players left on the team though, most notably PG Alex Caruso (9.0 PPG, 5.0 APG, 3.6 RPG) who is the returning assist leader in the conference. At 6-foot-5, he forces to defenses to have to collapse on him when he is driving, because he can finish very well at the basket. SG Jordan Green (6.9 PPG, 2.3 RPG, 1.6 APG) and PF Kourtney Roberson (9.8 PPG, 6.8 RPG, 59% FG) are two experienced players who are willing to do the dirty work for the team. Transfer F/G Jalen Jones (14 PPG and 7.7 RPG at SMU) is a player who is capable of leading this team in scoring. | | FLORIDA: The Gators had a tremendous team last year, earning the No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA's and reaching the Final Four before falling to eventual champion UConn. While Florida lost a lot of talent from last season's team (Casey Prather, Scottie Wilbekin and Patric Young), there is still enough able bodies remaining for the team to make another deep run in March. The biggest key to this team will be 6-foot-10 PF Chris Walker (1.9 PPG, 1.3 RPG, 59% FG in 4.8 MPG), who put on 15 pounds of muscle over the summer and appears to have his off-court affairs in order too after missing time due to academics and accepting improper benefits. Walker and freshman SF Devin Robinson will help give the Gators one of the most athletic frontcourts in the country. PF Dorian Finney-Smith (8.7 PPG, 6.7 RPG, 2.1 APG) and SG Michael Frazier II (12.4 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 45% threes) are two experienced players that will be looked upon to provide the Gators with 15+ points per night. Sophomore PG Kasey Hill (5.5 PPG, 3.1 APG, 2.0 RPG) is running the show now, and he had some great moments as a freshman. He is a talented playmaker that fits this Florida team perfectly. The Gators will look to run more this year than in the past, as head coach Billy Donovan has one of his speediest teams ever. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/17/2024 10:33:51 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|