|
|
RUTGERS DEPAUL |
|
| 145 | 69 Final 75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
517 | RUTGERS | 145.5 | 145 | 518 | DEPAUL | -1 | -1.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-10 | +3.4 | 9-11 | 3-1 | 66.3 | 31.3 | 44.1% | 34.8 | 66.5 | 28.9 | 41.8% | 33.3 | Road Games | 4-5 | +0.9 | 6-3 | 1-0 | 64.2 | 29.8 | 43.0% | 36.1 | 68.4 | 30.9 | 40.8% | 34.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 55.2 | 27.8 | 37.4% | 31.0 | 64.0 | 27.0 | 43.4% | 34.8 | Conference Games | 4-8 | -2.1 | 4-8 | 2-1 | 59.0 | 26.8 | 40.1% | 33.6 | 66.0 | 29.2 | 43.1% | 34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.3 | 31.3 | 24-54 | 44.1% | 5-14 | 35.1% | 13-19 | 71.8% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.2 | 29.7 | 23-55 | 41.0% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 13-19 | 69.3% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.2 | 29.8 | 23-54 | 43.0% | 6-15 | 37.0% | 12-16 | 74.0% | 36 | 8 | 12 | 21 | 8 | 17 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.5 | 28.9 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 6-20 | 31.2% | 14-21 | 69.9% | 33 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 31.8 | 25-57 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 13-20 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.4 | 30.9 | 23-56 | 40.8% | 6-21 | 30.2% | 16-24 | 67.3% | 34 | 10 | 14 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-14 | -6.5 | 10-10 | 4-2 | 73.5 | 35.5 | 43.6% | 36.2 | 73.8 | 37.4 | 44.6% | 39.2 | Home Games | 6-7 | -6.4 | 4-6 | 2-0 | 74.0 | 37.5 | 45.4% | 35.8 | 70.1 | 34.2 | 44.6% | 37.2 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4 | 3-2 | 3-0 | 74.4 | 34.2 | 43.4% | 34.0 | 84.6 | 40.6 | 49.2% | 37.6 | Conference Games | 1-10 | -6.4 | 5-6 | 3-0 | 72.0 | 34.1 | 41.7% | 33.6 | 82.5 | 41.5 | 48.6% | 41.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.5 | 35.5 | 27-63 | 43.6% | 5-17 | 31.0% | 14-20 | 70.4% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.8 | 29.9 | 23-55 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 13-19 | 69.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.0 | 37.5 | 28-63 | 45.4% | 5-16 | 29.8% | 12-18 | 68.9% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.8 | 37.4 | 27-60 | 44.6% | 5-15 | 33.7% | 15-22 | 67.4% | 39 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.1 | 31 | 24-55 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 67.8% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.1 | 34.2 | 25-57 | 44.6% | 5-16 | 34.6% | 14-21 | 65.7% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 18 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: RUTGERS 75.1, DEPAUL 72 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/28/2012 | RIDER | 68-56 | W | -10 | W | | - | 24-56 | 42.9% | 33 | 8 | 14-46 | 30.4% | 33 | 16 | 1/2/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | 53-78 | L | 15 | L | | - | 20-55 | 36.4% | 38 | 20 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | PITTSBURGH | 67-62 | W | 7 | W | 127 | O | 22-43 | 51.2% | 36 | 17 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 24 | 9 | 1/9/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | 58-56 | W | 3.5 | W | | - | 22-55 | 40.0% | 36 | 12 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 41 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | CINCINNATI | 58-68 | L | 5 | L | | - | 20-53 | 37.7% | 34 | 9 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 41 | 6 | 1/17/2013 | S FLORIDA | 70-67 | W | -4.5 | L | 124 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 32 | 6 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 28 | 9 | 1/19/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 66-69 | L | 12 | W | | - | 28-61 | 45.9% | 31 | 15 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 26 | 16 | 1/23/2013 | ST JOHNS | 60-72 | L | -4 | L | | - | 23-63 | 36.5% | 41 | 17 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | 1/27/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 54-66 | L | 9 | L | | - | 22-56 | 39.3% | 33 | 16 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | 1/30/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | 54-62 | L | 12 | W | | - | 18-48 | 37.5% | 27 | 21 | 18-48 | 37.5% | 35 | 17 | 2/6/2013 | LOUISVILLE | 48-68 | L | 12 | L | | - | 16-50 | 32.0% | 33 | 17 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 38 | 15 | 2/9/2013 | GEORGETOWN | 63-69 | L | 5 | L | | - | 21-54 | 38.9% | 28 | 8 | 27-47 | 57.4% | 29 | 11 | 2/12/2013 | SETON HALL | 57-55 | W | -4 | L | 130 | U | 18-46 | 39.1% | 34 | 12 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 35 | 14 | 2/16/2013 | @ DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2013 | @ VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/8/2013 | @ SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/29/2012 | LOYOLA-IL | 61-69 | L | -6 | L | | - | 24-55 | 43.6% | 34 | 15 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 30 | 15 | 1/2/2013 | SETON HALL | 72-73 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 27-59 | 45.8% | 32 | 12 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 40 | 21 | 1/5/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 83-73 | W | 7.5 | W | | - | 27-62 | 43.5% | 35 | 15 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 44 | 23 | 1/8/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 78-99 | L | 9 | L | | - | 31-70 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 49 | 13 | 1/15/2013 | CINCINNATI | 70-75 | L | 7 | W | | - | 31-66 | 47.0% | 27 | 10 | 25-42 | 59.5% | 35 | 19 | 1/19/2013 | ST JOHNS | 62-71 | L | -3 | L | | - | 25-72 | 34.7% | 43 | 18 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 18 | 1/26/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | 55-93 | L | 15.5 | L | | - | 18-65 | 27.7% | 34 | 18 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 58 | 18 | 1/30/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | 74-79 | L | 7 | W | 146 | O | 25-70 | 35.7% | 52 | 18 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 39 | 5 | 2/2/2013 | NOTRE DAME | 71-79 | L | 6 | L | 145.5 | O | 26-65 | 40.0% | 42 | 11 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 42 | 7 | 2/5/2013 | VILLANOVA | 71-94 | L | 3 | L | 145.5 | O | 26-58 | 44.8% | 27 | 16 | 34-57 | 59.6% | 33 | 13 | 2/9/2013 | @ MARQUETTE | 78-89 | L | 15 | W | | - | 29-59 | 49.2% | 24 | 10 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 30 | 9 | 2/13/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 78-82 | L | 12 | W | | - | 33-68 | 48.5% | 25 | 7 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 44 | 15 | 2/16/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | @ GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| RUTGERS: Even returning four starters, the Rutgers are long shots in this year's conference without bringing in any top freshmen. Last year's leading scorer, Eli Carter (13.8 PPG), will be the player to watch for the Scarlet Knights. Swingman Dane Miller (7.9 PPG, 6.6 RPG, 1.6 BPG, 1.3 SPG) is an asset defensively, though his offensive game leaves much to be desired. Guards Myles Mack (9.8 PPG, 34% 3-pt FG) and Jerome Seagears (7.7 PPG, 33% 3-pt FG) will have to shoot with greater accuracy for this team to be competitive. | | DEPAUL: The Blue Demons might be able to improve on last year's putrid three conference wins with the return of Cleveland Melvin (17.5 PPG, 7.4 RPG) and Brandon Young (14.5 PPG, 4.7 APG). But this is largely the same nucleus that struggled to compete last year, allowing the most points among Big East teams (76.7 PPG). |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/24/2024 4:10:13 PM EST. |
|
|