|
|
VILLANOVA First Half Results DEPAUL |
|
| 68.5 | 40 Final 40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
515 | VILLANOVA | -1.5 | 516 | DEPAUL | 68 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-9 | +2 | 13-6 | 6-7 | 68.5 | 32.4 | 40.4% | 37.8 | 66.0 | 28.3 | 39.5% | 34.2 | Road Games | 5-5 | +0.2 | 7-2 | 2-4 | 67.9 | 33.0 | 40.9% | 36.4 | 65.5 | 27.0 | 39.1% | 34.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +2.7 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 65.2 | 29.4 | 40.6% | 38.2 | 64.8 | 27.2 | 37.5% | 36.2 | Conference Games | 4-5 | +3.9 | 6-3 | 2-2 | 65.4 | 30.7 | 39.1% | 38.6 | 65.9 | 27.2 | 38.8% | 35.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.5 | 32.4 | 21-53 | 40.4% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 19-27 | 72.3% | 38 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.4 | 29.9 | 23-56 | 41.4% | 6-18 | 31.9% | 13-18 | 69.7% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.9 | 33.0 | 21-51 | 40.9% | 6-17 | 35.1% | 20-27 | 74.0% | 36 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.0 | 28.3 | 21-54 | 39.5% | 7-20 | 36.0% | 16-24 | 67.1% | 34 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 8 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 31.5 | 24-57 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 14-20 | 68.1% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.5 | 27.0 | 21-54 | 39.1% | 7-20 | 32.8% | 17-25 | 67.1% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 23 | 8 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-11 | -4.5 | 8-9 | 3-2 | 73.1 | 35.4 | 43.0% | 37.7 | 71.8 | 36.7 | 43.2% | 39.7 | Home Games | 6-6 | -5.4 | 4-5 | 1-0 | 74.2 | 37.3 | 45.4% | 36.6 | 68.1 | 33.7 | 43.3% | 37.5 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4.6 | 2-3 | 2-0 | 66.4 | 32.4 | 37.0% | 39.6 | 79.4 | 41.2 | 47.2% | 43.0 | Conference Games | 1-7 | -4.4 | 3-5 | 2-0 | 70.6 | 33.1 | 39.7% | 36.7 | 80.2 | 41.2 | 46.3% | 43.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.1 | 35.4 | 27-63 | 43.0% | 5-16 | 28.6% | 15-21 | 69.9% | 38 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 9 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.8 | 30.1 | 23-55 | 41.7% | 6-18 | 32.3% | 13-19 | 69.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.2 | 37.3 | 29-63 | 45.4% | 4-16 | 28.3% | 13-18 | 68.5% | 37 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 10 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.8 | 36.7 | 26-61 | 43.2% | 5-15 | 32.3% | 14-22 | 65.4% | 40 | 12 | 14 | 18 | 9 | 17 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 66.9 | 31 | 24-56 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 13-19 | 67.1% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 68.1 | 33.7 | 25-57 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 32.6% | 14-21 | 65.1% | 37 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 18 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VILLANOVA 75.7, DEPAUL 70.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/22/2012 | @ MONMOUTH | 83-56 | W | | - | | - | 23-42 | 54.8% | 28 | 19 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 29 | 23 | 12/28/2012 | NEW JERSEY TECH | 70-60 | W | | - | | - | 20-65 | 30.8% | 41 | 8 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 46 | 19 | 1/2/2013 | ST JOHNS | 98-86 | W | -7.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 27-63 | 42.9% | 47 | 18 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | 61-53 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 23-55 | 41.8% | 42 | 12 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 32 | 11 | 1/12/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | 61-72 | L | 14 | W | | - | 17-54 | 31.5% | 40 | 16 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 34 | 10 | 1/16/2013 | PITTSBURGH | 43-58 | L | 4.5 | L | 129 | U | 14-44 | 31.8% | 27 | 18 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 39 | 15 | 1/19/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 66-69 | L | 2.5 | L | | - | 22-49 | 44.9% | 35 | 25 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 41 | 13 | 1/22/2013 | LOUISVILLE | 73-64 | W | 11.5 | W | | - | 22-47 | 46.8% | 34 | 19 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 34 | 17 | 1/26/2013 | SYRACUSE | 75-71 | W | 7 | W | 136.5 | O | 24-57 | 42.1% | 50 | 14 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 41 | 7 | 1/30/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 60-65 | L | 8 | W | 133.5 | U | 21-50 | 42.0% | 34 | 9 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 32 | 6 | 2/3/2013 | PROVIDENCE | 52-55 | L | -6 | L | | - | 14-51 | 27.5% | 38 | 18 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 33 | 21 | 2/5/2013 | @ DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/25/2013 | @ SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/22/2012 | MD-BALT COUNTY | 69-61 | W | | - | | - | 20-49 | 40.8% | 39 | 18 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 38 | 20 | 12/29/2012 | LOYOLA-IL | 61-69 | L | -6 | L | | - | 24-55 | 43.6% | 34 | 15 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 30 | 15 | 1/2/2013 | SETON HALL | 72-73 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 27-59 | 45.8% | 32 | 12 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 40 | 21 | 1/5/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 83-73 | W | 7.5 | W | | - | 27-62 | 43.5% | 35 | 15 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 44 | 23 | 1/8/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 78-99 | L | 9 | L | | - | 31-70 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 49 | 13 | 1/15/2013 | CINCINNATI | 70-75 | L | 7 | W | | - | 31-66 | 47.0% | 27 | 10 | 25-42 | 59.5% | 35 | 19 | 1/19/2013 | ST JOHNS | 62-71 | L | -3 | L | | - | 25-72 | 34.7% | 43 | 18 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 18 | 1/26/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | 55-93 | L | 15.5 | L | | - | 18-65 | 27.7% | 34 | 18 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 58 | 18 | 1/30/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | 74-79 | L | 7 | W | 146 | O | 25-70 | 35.7% | 52 | 18 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 39 | 5 | 2/2/2013 | NOTRE DAME | 71-79 | L | 6 | L | 145.5 | O | 26-65 | 40.0% | 42 | 11 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 42 | 7 | 2/5/2013 | VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | @ GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VILLANOVA: With three returning starters, Jay Wright has veteran talent to mold, but it remains to be seen if that talent is enough to compete in this deep conference. Last year's leading scorers, Maalik Wayns and Dominic Cheek and their combined 30.1 PPG are gone, leaving a huge scoring void in the Wildcats backcourt. C Mouphtaou Yarou (11.3 PPG, 8.2 RPG) is also back, and the pressure will be on that pair to give this team a chance this year. Wright has also done a solid job recruiting with point guard Ryan Arcidiacono and 6-foot-10 PF Daniel Ochefu both talented enough to play meaningful minutes. | | DEPAUL: The Blue Demons might be able to improve on last year's putrid three conference wins with the return of Cleveland Melvin (17.5 PPG, 7.4 RPG) and Brandon Young (14.5 PPG, 4.7 APG). But this is largely the same nucleus that struggled to compete last year, allowing the most points among Big East teams (76.7 PPG). |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/23/2024 11:25:36 PM EST. |
|
|