|
|
CINCINNATI CONNECTICUT |
|
| 128 | 66 Final 73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
507 | CINCINNATI | 126.5 | -1 | 508 | CONNECTICUT | -1 | 127 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 19-7 | +2.8 | 10-12 | 3-11 | 69.8 | 32.2 | 41.1% | 40.9 | 58.5 | 25.6 | 38.1% | 33.5 | Road Games | 8-2 | +6.2 | 8-2 | 2-5 | 67.0 | 29.4 | 39.8% | 39.6 | 59.6 | 28.0 | 40.5% | 34.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.7 | 2-3 | 0-3 | 58.0 | 28.4 | 35.2% | 35.6 | 57.4 | 28.0 | 42.0% | 32.6 | Conference Games | 7-6 | +0.3 | 5-8 | 2-6 | 61.8 | 27.2 | 37.8% | 35.9 | 59.6 | 26.8 | 41.8% | 31.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.8 | 32.2 | 24-59 | 41.1% | 7-22 | 32.3% | 14-22 | 64.8% | 41 | 13 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.8 | 30.1 | 23-55 | 41.6% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 13-19 | 68.6% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.0 | 29.4 | 22-55 | 39.8% | 6-21 | 30.0% | 17-24 | 71.1% | 40 | 13 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.5 | 25.6 | 21-55 | 38.1% | 5-17 | 29.9% | 11-18 | 63.3% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 31.4 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 14-21 | 68.5% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 59.6 | 28.0 | 22-54 | 40.5% | 4-17 | 26.3% | 11-18 | 61.2% | 34 | 11 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 17-7 | +8.1 | 9-10 | 6-7 | 70.6 | 31.4 | 45.0% | 32.5 | 65.1 | 28.6 | 40.2% | 37.0 | Home Games | 11-2 | +3.6 | 4-5 | 0-4 | 70.0 | 33.0 | 45.8% | 34.0 | 60.5 | 26.2 | 38.7% | 36.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.3 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 67.8 | 26.2 | 40.6% | 35.2 | 66.0 | 29.4 | 39.1% | 37.6 | Conference Games | 7-5 | +3.3 | 7-5 | 4-3 | 70.5 | 29.7 | 43.9% | 33.8 | 68.6 | 29.7 | 41.1% | 37.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.6 | 31.4 | 24-54 | 45.0% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 15-21 | 74.7% | 32 | 8 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.7 | 30.1 | 23-55 | 41.5% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.0 | 33.0 | 25-54 | 45.8% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 15-20 | 72.7% | 34 | 8 | 15 | 14 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.1 | 28.6 | 23-58 | 40.2% | 5-17 | 30.9% | 13-19 | 69.5% | 37 | 12 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68 | 31.7 | 24-55 | 43.5% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 15-21 | 69.0% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 60.5 | 26.2 | 23-59 | 38.7% | 5-19 | 28.5% | 10-14 | 67.6% | 36 | 12 | 11 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CINCINNATI 74.6, CONNECTICUT 76 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/5/2013 | ST JOHNS | 52-53 | L | -13.5 | L | 138 | U | 19-60 | 31.7% | 34 | 16 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 40 | 17 | 1/7/2013 | NOTRE DAME | 60-66 | L | -4.5 | L | 132.5 | U | 23-49 | 46.9% | 28 | 9 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 23 | 7 | 1/12/2013 | @ RUTGERS | 68-58 | W | -5 | W | | - | 20-53 | 37.7% | 41 | 6 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 34 | 9 | 1/15/2013 | @ DEPAUL | 75-70 | W | -7 | L | | - | 25-42 | 59.5% | 35 | 19 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 27 | 10 | 1/19/2013 | MARQUETTE | 71-69 | W | -7.5 | L | 128.5 | O | 20-58 | 34.5% | 41 | 12 | 20-62 | 32.3% | 41 | 11 | 1/21/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | 55-57 | L | 8.5 | W | 131.5 | U | 18-55 | 32.7% | 38 | 10 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 28 | 6 | 1/30/2013 | RUTGERS | 62-54 | W | -12 | L | | - | 18-48 | 37.5% | 35 | 17 | 18-48 | 37.5% | 27 | 21 | 2/2/2013 | @ SETON HALL | 65-59 | W | -5.5 | W | 127.5 | U | 18-49 | 36.7% | 39 | 13 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 34 | 14 | 2/6/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 50-54 | L | -4 | L | | - | 18-48 | 37.5% | 38 | 15 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 31 | 10 | 2/9/2013 | PITTSBURGH | 52-62 | L | -1.5 | L | 122 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 33 | 12 | 20-44 | 45.5% | 30 | 7 | 2/12/2013 | VILLANOVA | 68-50 | W | -7.5 | W | | - | 21-53 | 39.6% | 31 | 11 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 36 | 19 | 2/15/2013 | GEORGETOWN | 55-62 | L | -4 | L | 117.5 | U | 17-54 | 31.5% | 37 | 11 | 20-48 | 41.7% | 32 | 10 | 2/21/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/4/2013 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/8/2013 | DEPAUL | 99-78 | W | -9 | W | | - | 36-73 | 49.3% | 49 | 13 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 1/12/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 65-58 | W | 8.5 | W | | - | 27-53 | 50.9% | 34 | 7 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 28 | 9 | 1/14/2013 | LOUISVILLE | 58-73 | L | 6.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 21-53 | 39.6% | 28 | 17 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 36 | 13 | 1/19/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | 61-69 | L | 10.5 | W | 122.5 | O | 22-50 | 44.0% | 27 | 11 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 38 | 11 | 1/27/2013 | RUTGERS | 66-54 | W | -9 | W | | - | 22-52 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 33 | 16 | 1/31/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 82-79 | W | -1 | W | 136 | O | 27-54 | 50.0% | 24 | 11 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 55 | 17 | 2/3/2013 | S FLORIDA | 69-64 | W | -10 | L | | - | 17-57 | 29.8% | 41 | 10 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 43 | 14 | 2/6/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | 65-71 | L | -2 | L | 133.5 | O | 20-65 | 30.8% | 41 | 7 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 43 | 9 | 2/10/2013 | @ SETON HALL | 78-67 | W | -2 | W | | - | 26-48 | 54.2% | 31 | 16 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 25 | 16 | 2/13/2013 | SYRACUSE | 66-58 | W | 4 | W | 135.5 | U | 21-45 | 46.7% | 38 | 18 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 36 | 10 | 2/16/2013 | VILLANOVA | 61-70 | L | -4.5 | L | 132.5 | U | 22-46 | 47.8% | 25 | 19 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 41 | 15 | 2/21/2013 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | @ DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CINCINNATI: The Bearcats hung around amongst the Big East elite last year, tying for fourth with a 12-6 conference record and reaching the Sweet 16. They bring back their leading scorer Sean Kilpatrick (14.3 PPG, 4.6 RPG), who averaged 2.5 three-pointers per game last year and isn't afraid to shoot the ball. Although the next two leading scorers'Dion Dixon and Yancy Gates'are gone, Cashmere Wright (10.9 PPG, 4.6 APG) is back to give this team a senior presence running the point. If fellow senior JaQuon Parker (9.4 PPG, 5.6 RPG) improves on his play from last season with increased minutes, this will be a nasty backcourt. It remains to be seen, though, if guys like Justin Jackson (5.1 PPG, 4.2 RPG), 6-foot-10 sophomore Kelvin Gaines and freshman Shaquille Thomas can step up in the post for Mick Cronin to make this team compete with the conference's best. | | CONNECTICUT: Hall of Famer Jim Calhoun is no longer roaming the sidelines for the Huskies, and his former point guard Kevin Ollie will take the reins with zero head coaching experience. It will take Ollie a while to rebuild this team that lost Jeremy Lamb and Andre Drummond to the NBA and Alex Oriakhi to transfer. Shabazz Napier (13.0 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 5.8 APG) will have to bear the brunt of the burden running this offense while Ryan Boatright (10.4 PPG, 4.0 APG, 38% 3-pt FG) will have to step up in his sophomore year. Omar Calhoun should be a valuable asset at guard in his freshman season, but it will still be difficult for this crew to compete in the conference. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/28/2024 12:05:22 AM EST. |
|
|