| | | |
UTAH COLORADO |
|
| 132.5 | 75 Final 79 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
573 | UTAH | 132 | 132 | 574 | COLORADO | -3 | -2 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 14-6 | +0.7 | 12-2 | 5-9 | 79.4 | 36.5 | 50.4% | 36.9 | 62.2 | 27.9 | 39.9% | 31.1 | Road Games | 0-5 | -5.6 | 3-1 | 1-4 | 60.2 | 27.4 | 42.1% | 30.0 | 64.2 | 29.0 | 45.0% | 33.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.6 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 67.0 | 33.2 | 43.5% | 30.8 | 65.6 | 29.8 | 44.7% | 34.8 | Conference Games | 3-5 | -2.6 | 6-1 | 3-5 | 67.5 | 32.5 | 44.1% | 30.9 | 65.7 | 29.4 | 44.8% | 33.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.4 | 36.5 | 28-56 | 50.4% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 16-22 | 75.3% | 37 | 8 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 34.9 | 26-58 | 45.3% | 7-19 | 35.2% | 16-23 | 69.2% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 60.2 | 27.4 | 21-50 | 42.1% | 4-18 | 23.9% | 13-19 | 69.8% | 30 | 7 | 8 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.2 | 27.9 | 22-56 | 39.9% | 5-18 | 29.0% | 12-18 | 65.6% | 31 | 8 | 10 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70.7 | 32.8 | 25-57 | 43.2% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 16-22 | 70.5% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 64.2 | 29.0 | 23-50 | 45.0% | 4-13 | 31.7% | 15-23 | 64.7% | 33 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 15-6 | +3.2 | 11-9 | 7-9 | 73.5 | 33.4 | 44.6% | 38.4 | 68.0 | 31.9 | 42.7% | 30.8 | Home Games | 12-1 | +4.8 | 7-5 | 5-4 | 79.2 | 37.4 | 47.9% | 39.3 | 67.5 | 32.0 | 41.4% | 29.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.8 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 60.2 | 29.0 | 41.4% | 36.2 | 68.6 | 31.6 | 44.0% | 32.4 | Conference Games | 4-4 | +0.2 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 67.0 | 30.6 | 42.9% | 36.0 | 70.2 | 32.1 | 43.2% | 33.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.5 | 33.4 | 24-54 | 44.6% | 5-17 | 30.8% | 20-28 | 71.9% | 38 | 11 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 69.3 | 32.2 | 24-56 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 15-22 | 69.0% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.2 | 37.4 | 25-52 | 47.9% | 6-17 | 35.4% | 23-32 | 73.3% | 39 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.0 | 31.9 | 24-56 | 42.7% | 7-20 | 36.7% | 12-18 | 69.5% | 31 | 8 | 12 | 22 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 74.6 | 35 | 26-55 | 46.2% | 6-17 | 36.5% | 17-24 | 71.0% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 67.5 | 32.0 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 8-22 | 36.1% | 11-17 | 67.7% | 29 | 8 | 12 | 23 | 7 | 13 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: UTAH 69.6, COLORADO 75.8 |
| | |
|
|
12/14/2013 | BYU | 81-64 | W | 2.5 | W | 159 | U | 27-65 | 41.5% | 45 | 10 | 21-64 | 32.8% | 44 | 10 | 12/19/2013 | TEXAS ST | 69-50 | W | -15 | W | 128 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 33 | 12 | 18-47 | 38.3% | 30 | 15 | 12/28/2013 | ST KATHERINE | 124-51 | W | | - | | - | 49-73 | 67.1% | 71 | 14 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 12 | 7 | 1/2/2014 | OREGON | 68-70 | L | 2.5 | W | 149 | U | 24-63 | 38.1% | 38 | 14 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 16 | 1/4/2014 | OREGON ST | 80-69 | W | -7 | W | 139 | O | 29-50 | 58.0% | 24 | 8 | 25-50 | 50.0% | 27 | 15 | 1/8/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 57-59 | L | 2 | T | 142.5 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 31 | 12 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 26 | 14 | 1/12/2014 | @ WASHINGTON ST | 46-49 | L | -3 | L | 122.5 | U | 13-44 | 29.5% | 32 | 10 | 15-40 | 37.5% | 34 | 12 | 1/16/2014 | USC | 84-66 | W | -10.5 | W | 137.5 | O | 30-61 | 49.2% | 32 | 8 | 25-50 | 50.0% | 32 | 17 | 1/18/2014 | UCLA | 74-69 | W | -1 | W | 144 | U | 25-53 | 47.2% | 31 | 15 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 35 | 15 | 1/23/2014 | @ ARIZONA ST | 75-79 | L | 5 | W | 135.5 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 30 | 12 | 26-49 | 53.1% | 33 | 11 | 1/26/2014 | @ ARIZONA | 56-65 | L | 13 | W | 130 | U | 19-47 | 40.4% | 29 | 14 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 40 | 11 | 2/1/2014 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2014 | @ USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2014 | ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/13/2013 | ELON | 80-63 | W | -15 | W | 147 | U | 24-49 | 49.0% | 54 | 16 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 27 | 10 | 12/21/2013 | *OKLAHOMA ST | 73-78 | L | 7 | W | 147.5 | O | 26-64 | 40.6% | 41 | 14 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 30 | 14 | 12/28/2013 | GEORGIA | 84-70 | W | -15 | L | 136.5 | O | 25-49 | 51.0% | 34 | 14 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 22 | 10 | 1/2/2014 | OREGON ST | 64-58 | W | -12 | L | 146.5 | U | 21-55 | 38.2% | 34 | 7 | 18-48 | 37.5% | 36 | 17 | 1/5/2014 | OREGON | 100-91 | W | -4.5 | W | 147.5 | O | 31-55 | 56.4% | 39 | 16 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 33 | 9 | 1/8/2014 | *WASHINGTON ST | 71-70 | W | -8.5 | L | 128 | O | 21-51 | 41.2% | 34 | 6 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 33 | 11 | 1/12/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 54-71 | L | -3.5 | L | 146.5 | U | 19-55 | 34.5% | 38 | 20 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 30 | 13 | 1/16/2014 | UCLA | 56-69 | L | -1 | L | 150 | U | 20-50 | 40.0% | 37 | 17 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 41 | 11 | 1/18/2014 | USC | 83-62 | W | -11.5 | W | 140.5 | O | 29-57 | 50.9% | 43 | 12 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 23 | 11 | 1/23/2014 | @ ARIZONA | 57-69 | L | 14.5 | W | 132.5 | U | 20-52 | 38.5% | 32 | 16 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 32 | 7 | 1/25/2014 | @ ARIZONA ST | 51-72 | L | 5 | L | 142.5 | U | 20-47 | 42.6% | 31 | 19 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 36 | 16 | 2/1/2014 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2014 | @ UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2014 | @ USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | UTAH: It may be a very difficult season for the Utes, as they return one starter and bring in seven guys that have not played for a game for the team. Their top returner, SF Jordan Loveridge (12.1 PPG, 7.0 RPG, 37% 3-pt FG) is only a sophomore. He is your typical staff-stuffer who can influence the game in many different areas. With so many new faces, for the Utes will look for him to push those numbers up to 16 points and 10 rebounds a game to help make up for the other losses on the roster. Another sophomore, 5-foot-10 PG Brandon Taylor (6.9 PPG, 2.0 APG, 42% 3-pt FG) is another guy that has the potential to take his game to the next level. | | COLORADO: Despite losing Andre Roberson to the NBA, the Buffaloes should be even better than last season's NCAA Tournament team. SG Spencer Dinwiddie (15.3 PPG, 3.2 RPG, 3.0 APG) has a chance to be one of the elite guards in all of the country. The bigger the game, the better he is going to play, as he is the unquestioned star on the Colorado team. He spent time in the summer playing with the United States U-20 team, and he has come back more explosive than he was last season. He will be looking to shoot better from three-point line this season, as he hit only 33% of his attempts from deep last season, compared to 43 % two seasons ago. He will be joined in the backcourt by junior PG Askia Booker (12.4 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 2.2 APG), who is very good at getting to the basket and making plays for both himself and teammates. He is fearless when driving to the rack, and has the ability to take over games. However, the guy to look out for is 6-foot-7 freshman swingman Chris Jenkins. He is a very talented player, that has not gotten the publicity like Aaron Gordon of Arizona, but by the end of the season, could be a household name. C Josh Scott (10.2 PPG, 5.7 RPG) and SF Xavier Johnson (8.9 PPG, 4.8 RPG, 44% 3-pt FG) are two sophomores on the rise. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 12:39:44 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|