|
|
NC STATE CLEMSON |
|
| 121.5 | 66 Final 61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
545 | NC STATE | Pick | 121.5 | 546 | CLEMSON | 121.5 | -1 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 17-12 | -0.5 | 13-9 | 11-10 | 70.8 | 33.3 | 44.0% | 37.9 | 65.3 | 30.3 | 40.4% | 34.4 | Road Games | 4-6 | +2.9 | 4-3 | 5-5 | 67.3 | 32.7 | 42.3% | 35.5 | 69.6 | 33.9 | 42.8% | 36.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +5 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 62.2 | 27.6 | 39.1% | 36.8 | 58.8 | 27.2 | 40.5% | 35.2 | Conference Games | 8-8 | +4.6 | 10-4 | 8-8 | 69.1 | 30.8 | 43.0% | 36.4 | 66.9 | 30.3 | 41.9% | 36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.8 | 33.3 | 25-57 | 44.0% | 7-18 | 36.1% | 14-20 | 67.6% | 38 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 4 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.3 | 29.5 | 23-54 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.3 | 32.7 | 24-57 | 42.3% | 7-19 | 38.1% | 11-19 | 61.5% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 4 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.3 | 30.3 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 14-19 | 69.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 5 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.1 | 32.3 | 25-55 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 14-20 | 68.0% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.6 | 33.9 | 24-55 | 42.8% | 6-17 | 37.8% | 16-22 | 72.6% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 16-12 | +1.8 | 13-11 | 5-14 | 62.2 | 30.2 | 41.4% | 36.2 | 60.9 | 25.7 | 39.4% | 34.1 | Home Games | 11-5 | +0.4 | 7-5 | 3-7 | 66.1 | 31.2 | 42.5% | 38.2 | 59.9 | 25.1 | 38.8% | 33.4 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 62.2 | 31.0 | 43.6% | 33.4 | 63.6 | 26.4 | 42.2% | 32.8 | Conference Games | 8-8 | +4 | 9-7 | 4-12 | 59.1 | 28.2 | 39.5% | 35.2 | 60.2 | 25.1 | 39.5% | 34.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 62.2 | 30.2 | 22-53 | 41.4% | 6-18 | 30.0% | 13-19 | 66.9% | 36 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.6 | 30.6 | 24-56 | 42.5% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 13-19 | 68.5% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 66.1 | 31.2 | 23-54 | 42.5% | 6-20 | 29.3% | 14-21 | 67.2% | 38 | 10 | 11 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.9 | 25.7 | 22-56 | 39.4% | 6-18 | 32.0% | 11-16 | 68.1% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.2 | 32.1 | 25-56 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 14-21 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.9 | 25.1 | 22-56 | 38.8% | 6-18 | 30.6% | 11-16 | 67.1% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NC STATE 78.7, CLEMSON 76.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/14/2015 | N CAROLINA | 79-81 | L | 4.5 | W | 143 | O | 28-66 | 42.4% | 37 | 10 | 30-54 | 55.6% | 33 | 13 | 1/17/2015 | @ FLORIDA ST | 72-63 | W | -1 | W | 138.5 | U | 27-61 | 44.3% | 38 | 14 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 34 | 12 | 1/22/2015 | @ MIAMI | 60-65 | L | 5 | T | 134.5 | U | 26-60 | 43.3% | 33 | 10 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 31 | 9 | 1/25/2015 | NOTRE DAME | 78-81 | L | 1.5 | L | 144 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 34 | 9 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 43 | 10 | 1/28/2015 | CLEMSON | 57-68 | L | -8 | L | 128 | U | 18-63 | 28.6% | 45 | 11 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 37 | 12 | 1/31/2015 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 81-80 | W | -1 | T | 129 | O | 30-62 | 48.4% | 31 | 8 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 49 | 11 | 2/3/2015 | @ WAKE FOREST | 84-88 | L | -1 | L | 142.5 | O | 31-75 | 41.3% | 42 | 11 | 29-51 | 56.9% | 35 | 13 | 2/11/2015 | VIRGINIA | 47-51 | L | 7 | W | 125.5 | U | 19-57 | 33.3% | 31 | 6 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 43 | 12 | 2/14/2015 | @ LOUISVILLE | 74-65 | W | 10.5 | W | 133 | O | 26-58 | 44.8% | 47 | 8 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 37 | 5 | 2/21/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | 69-53 | W | -13 | W | 137.5 | U | 25-48 | 52.1% | 28 | 7 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 23 | 8 | 2/24/2015 | @ N CAROLINA | 58-46 | W | 9 | W | 152.5 | U | 20-57 | 35.1% | 41 | 9 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 38 | 12 | 2/28/2015 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 63-79 | L | -5.5 | L | 134.5 | O | 21-64 | 32.8% | 37 | 9 | 25-44 | 56.8% | 35 | 12 | 3/3/2015 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/13/2015 | @ VIRGINIA | 42-65 | L | 16.5 | L | 117 | U | 15-42 | 35.7% | 29 | 11 | 25-50 | 50.0% | 27 | 4 | 1/17/2015 | SYRACUSE | 66-53 | W | 1.5 | W | 120.5 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 30 | 9 | 1/19/2015 | FLORIDA ST | 55-59 | L | -4.5 | L | 124.5 | U | 17-50 | 34.0% | 31 | 10 | 22-46 | 47.8% | 32 | 16 | 1/24/2015 | WAKE FOREST | 59-57 | W | -5 | L | 127 | U | 20-57 | 35.1% | 43 | 7 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 45 | 10 | 1/28/2015 | @ NC STATE | 68-57 | W | 8 | W | 128 | U | 25-53 | 47.2% | 37 | 12 | 18-63 | 28.6% | 45 | 11 | 1/31/2015 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 64-49 | W | -5 | W | 118 | U | 22-56 | 39.3% | 37 | 8 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 27 | 13 | 2/4/2015 | @ FLORIDA ST | 62-56 | W | 2 | W | 124.5 | U | 19-47 | 40.4% | 34 | 14 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 37 | 17 | 2/8/2015 | @ MIAMI | 45-56 | L | 6.5 | L | 117 | U | 20-61 | 32.8% | 36 | 10 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 36 | 11 | 2/10/2015 | NOTRE DAME | 58-60 | L | 3.5 | W | 126 | U | 24-56 | 42.9% | 38 | 11 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 26 | 8 | 2/14/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | 75-54 | W | -9.5 | W | 122 | O | 27-57 | 47.4% | 38 | 8 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 28 | 11 | 2/16/2015 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 52-63 | L | 2.5 | L | 117.5 | U | 20-55 | 36.4% | 29 | 14 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 38 | 15 | 2/21/2015 | @ DUKE | 56-78 | L | 13 | L | 129.5 | O | 22-53 | 41.5% | 29 | 14 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 33 | 11 | 2/28/2015 | GEORGIA TECH | 70-63 | W | -5.5 | W | 114.5 | O | 22-43 | 51.2% | 33 | 18 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 13 | 3/3/2015 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NC STATE: NC State has to replace T.J. Warren, who averaged nearly 25 points last season. However, the Wolfpack have a transfer in SG Trevor Lacey, who averaged 9.3 PPG at Alabama two seasons ago. Lacey was a much-heralded recruit out of high school, and has the talent to help NC State fill the scoring void left by Warren. SG Ralston Turner (10.5 PPG, 37% threes) and PG Anthony "Cat" Barber (8.5 PPG, 3.5 APG) are two guys that sacrificed their numbers for Warren last season, and they are both versatile enough to increase their points significantly. The guards of NC State will be huge this season, as the team is lacking a true go-to post presence. | | CLEMSON: The Tigers return four starters, but the one they don't have, K.J. McDaniels, was the star of the team with more than 17 points and seven boards per game. SG Damarcus Harrison (7.8 PPG, 2.7 RPG) is the leading scorer on the team, and should once again prove to be a key player for this team that won 23 games last season and nearly made the NCAA Tournament. The guy with the most scoring potential on the team is SG Jordan Roper (7.4 PPG in 19.2 MPG). He was a reserve on last season's team, but the junior has the potential to double his scoring this season. The Tigers were a tremendous defensive squad (58.4 PPG allowed, 2nd in ACC), and that helped them make a deep run in the NIT where they lost in the semifinals. Scoring once again may be difficult for Clemson, so the school will have to bring that same type of defensive effort on a nightly basis. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/20/2024 9:24:32 AM EST. |
|
|