|
|
NC STATE CLEMSON |
|
|
| 58 Final 57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
821 | NC STATE | -2.5 | -2 | 822 | CLEMSON | | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 16-7 | -4.2 | 11-9 | 8-7 | 78.8 | 37.8 | 50.6% | 36.6 | 71.3 | 33.0 | 41.7% | 34.5 | Road Games | 4-6 | -9.1 | 4-5 | 3-5 | 71.5 | 33.9 | 46.5% | 36.5 | 71.7 | 33.7 | 42.2% | 35.8 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5.7 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 78.6 | 40.0 | 48.7% | 37.2 | 80.8 | 35.4 | 47.8% | 33.0 | Conference Games | 5-5 | -2.7 | 5-5 | 4-3 | 75.4 | 35.7 | 46.9% | 37.2 | 73.6 | 33.0 | 43.6% | 34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.8 | 37.8 | 29-57 | 50.6% | 5-13 | 40.3% | 16-23 | 68.0% | 37 | 9 | 15 | 15 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65 | 30 | 23-56 | 41.4% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.5 | 33.9 | 27-59 | 46.5% | 5-13 | 37.8% | 12-20 | 60.8% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.3 | 33.0 | 26-63 | 41.7% | 6-20 | 29.3% | 13-18 | 72.7% | 35 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.8 | 32.5 | 25-56 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 14-20 | 69.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.7 | 33.7 | 24-58 | 42.2% | 6-20 | 32.2% | 16-22 | 72.3% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-10 | -1.4 | 10-8 | 3-7 | 63.3 | 28.3 | 43.3% | 34.2 | 58.9 | 27.5 | 40.7% | 32.1 | Home Games | 8-3 | -0.3 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 69.6 | 32.5 | 47.3% | 35.4 | 56.5 | 28.1 | 36.9% | 33.6 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 1-4 | 1-0 | 61.2 | 25.4 | 40.4% | 35.4 | 68.6 | 30.4 | 45.9% | 28.2 | Conference Games | 4-6 | -1.6 | 4-6 | 1-3 | 59.3 | 24.3 | 40.2% | 34.3 | 63.6 | 29.0 | 42.8% | 31.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.3 | 28.3 | 23-53 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 32.2% | 12-18 | 67.0% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.1 | 31 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 13-18 | 68.6% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.6 | 32.5 | 25-53 | 47.3% | 6-17 | 35.8% | 13-20 | 65.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 15 | 8 | 11 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.9 | 27.5 | 21-52 | 40.7% | 6-16 | 35.1% | 11-17 | 66.1% | 32 | 9 | 12 | 16 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.7 | 31.5 | 24-55 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 34.8% | 14-20 | 68.7% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 56.5 | 28.1 | 20-55 | 36.9% | 5-16 | 32.0% | 11-15 | 70.7% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NC STATE 76.3, CLEMSON 73 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/22/2012 | ST BONAVENTURE | 92-73 | W | -10.5 | W | | - | 32-56 | 57.1% | 35 | 12 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 38 | 14 | 12/29/2012 | W MICHIGAN | 84-68 | W | -17.5 | L | 146.5 | O | 30-55 | 54.5% | 32 | 8 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 42 | 12 | 12/31/2012 | UNC-GREENSBORO | 89-68 | W | -22.5 | L | 164.5 | U | 32-60 | 53.3% | 37 | 11 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 34 | 10 | 1/5/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 78-73 | W | -7.5 | L | 146.5 | O | 24-50 | 48.0% | 32 | 7 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 31 | 8 | 1/9/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | 83-70 | W | -9 | W | | - | 28-55 | 50.9% | 43 | 13 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 37 | 7 | 1/12/2013 | DUKE | 84-76 | W | 1.5 | W | 150 | O | 30-59 | 50.8% | 34 | 11 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 35 | 12 | 1/16/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 50-51 | L | 2.5 | W | 149 | U | 19-61 | 31.1% | 41 | 11 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 45 | 13 | 1/20/2013 | CLEMSON | 66-62 | W | -8.5 | L | 132.5 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 36 | 9 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 33 | 6 | 1/22/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | 84-86 | L | -8 | L | | - | 34-70 | 48.6% | 44 | 13 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 40 | 12 | 1/26/2013 | N CAROLINA | 91-83 | W | -4 | W | 159 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 16 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 32 | 14 | 1/29/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 55-58 | L | 3.5 | W | 125.5 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 38 | 14 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 33 | 8 | 2/2/2013 | MIAMI | 78-79 | L | 0 | L | 136.5 | O | 28-52 | 53.8% | 31 | 12 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 28 | 8 | 2/7/2013 | @ DUKE | 85-98 | L | 12 | L | | - | 35-66 | 53.0% | 31 | 7 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 32 | 8 | 2/10/2013 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/23/2012 | S CAROLINA ST | 77-41 | W | | - | | - | 30-61 | 49.2% | 39 | 9 | 18-58 | 31.0% | 35 | 18 | 1/1/2013 | THE CITADEL | 92-51 | W | -22 | W | | - | 35-57 | 61.4% | 26 | 8 | 20-40 | 50.0% | 22 | 25 | 1/5/2013 | FLORIDA ST | 66-71 | L | -3 | L | | - | 21-54 | 38.9% | 37 | 13 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 33 | 14 | 1/8/2013 | @ DUKE | 40-68 | L | 15.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 15-53 | 28.3% | 31 | 13 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 42 | 13 | 1/12/2013 | VIRGINIA | 59-44 | W | -1.5 | W | | - | 17-33 | 51.5% | 29 | 15 | 17-48 | 35.4% | 23 | 12 | 1/15/2013 | WAKE FOREST | 60-44 | W | -7 | W | 127.5 | U | 22-49 | 44.9% | 36 | 11 | 15-61 | 24.6% | 42 | 11 | 1/20/2013 | @ NC STATE | 62-66 | L | 8.5 | W | 132.5 | U | 26-64 | 40.6% | 33 | 6 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 36 | 9 | 1/24/2013 | @ FLORIDA ST | 57-60 | L | 4.5 | W | | - | 22-54 | 40.7% | 34 | 13 | 19-46 | 41.3% | 23 | 15 | 1/27/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | 77-70 | W | -11.5 | L | | - | 22-49 | 44.9% | 42 | 9 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 33 | 5 | 1/29/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | 63-60 | W | -6 | L | | - | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 15 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 35 | 17 | 2/2/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 68-75 | L | 1 | L | | - | 21-53 | 39.6% | 34 | 15 | 26-45 | 57.8% | 21 | 14 | 2/7/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 41-78 | L | 7.5 | L | 111.5 | O | 16-52 | 30.8% | 33 | 19 | 30-54 | 55.6% | 29 | 6 | 2/10/2013 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2013 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/28/2013 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NC STATE: From barely making last year's NCAA Tournament to ACC favorites this year, the Wolfpack have the burden of heavy expectations this year with a veteran squad that is supplemented by a heralded recruiting class. C.J. Leslie (14.7 PPG, 7.3 RPG) and Richard Howell (10.8 PPG, 9.2 RPG) return to form the conference's most physical post tandem, while Lorenzo Brown (12.7 PPG, 6.3 APG) may be the best point guard in the league. He is joined in the backcourt by arguably the conference's most college-ready recruit in Rodney Purvis, who can light up a scoreboard. Head coach Mark Gottfried has no shortage of weapons this season with senior forward Scott Wood (12.4 PPG) rounding out the crew at 6-foot-6 and possessing a knack from deep, nailing 2.6 treys per game last year at a 41% clip. | | CLEMSON: Head coach Brad Brownell kept the Tigers at .500 in the ACC last season, but may struggle to do so again without departed two leading scorers, Andre Young and Tanner Smith. This is senior center Devin Booker's (10.5 PPG, 7.0 RPG) team now, while he should be should receive solid help in the frontcourt by senior forward Milton Jennings (9.7 PPG, 5.6 RPG). |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 4:53:52 AM EST. |
|
|