|
|
NOTRE DAME CINCINNATI |
|
| 132.5 | 66 Final 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
719 | NOTRE DAME | +170 | 720 | CINCINNATI | -200 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-1 | +3.2 | 6-4 | 5-1 | 77.6 | 37.5 | 51.5% | 38.6 | 60.9 | 28.4 | 38.3% | 30.7 | Road Games | 2-1 | +0.2 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 76.3 | 35.3 | 45.9% | 36.7 | 71.7 | 33.3 | 41.8% | 36.7 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +2 | 3-1 | 3-0 | 84.4 | 39.8 | 56.0% | 37.8 | 65.6 | 31.4 | 39.6% | 28.6 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 93.0 | 44.0 | 56.5% | 37.0 | 74.0 | 36.0 | 45.3% | 30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.6 | 37.5 | 29-56 | 51.5% | 7-18 | 40.6% | 12-18 | 69.0% | 39 | 9 | 20 | 12 | 6 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67 | 31.4 | 24-55 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 14-20 | 68.7% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.3 | 35.3 | 26-57 | 45.9% | 7-19 | 37.5% | 17-23 | 74.3% | 37 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.9 | 28.4 | 23-59 | 38.3% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 9-13 | 71.2% | 31 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 67.7 | 31.7 | 24-57 | 42.6% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 13-19 | 67.9% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.7 | 33.3 | 25-61 | 41.8% | 4-14 | 30.2% | 17-22 | 76.9% | 37 | 12 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-2 | +4.5 | 6-5 | 2-6 | 75.6 | 35.4 | 42.9% | 44.5 | 57.4 | 25.1 | 35.7% | 35.2 | Home Games | 8-2 | -1.5 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 77.7 | 37.7 | 44.4% | 46.3 | 56.3 | 22.5 | 34.5% | 34.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.5 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 60.8 | 23.4 | 34.9% | 41.4 | 54.4 | 26.4 | 38.5% | 36.4 | Conference Games | 1-1 | +2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 61.0 | 23.5 | 36.0% | 35.5 | 57.0 | 29.0 | 42.1% | 36.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.6 | 35.4 | 28-64 | 42.9% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 13-21 | 62.5% | 45 | 14 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 31.2 | 23-56 | 41.8% | 6-19 | 32.4% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.7 | 37.7 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 11-20 | 56.1% | 46 | 14 | 16 | 16 | 10 | 14 | 8 | Stats Against (All Games) | 57.4 | 25.1 | 21-58 | 35.7% | 5-17 | 29.0% | 11-18 | 59.9% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68 | 31.5 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 6-17 | 32.1% | 14-21 | 67.6% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 56.3 | 22.5 | 21-60 | 34.5% | 5-17 | 28.9% | 10-16 | 61.5% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NOTRE DAME 70.3, CINCINNATI 71.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2012 | GEORGE WASHINGTON | 65-48 | W | -17 | T | | - | 28-58 | 48.3% | 41 | 10 | 22-67 | 32.8% | 38 | 11 | 11/24/2012 | ST FRANCIS-PA | 69-52 | W | | - | | - | 28-57 | 49.1% | 42 | 9 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 25 | 9 | 11/26/2012 | CHICAGO ST | 92-65 | W | -32 | L | 133.5 | O | 36-59 | 61.0% | 36 | 10 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 30 | 9 | 11/29/2012 | KENTUCKY | 64-50 | W | -1.5 | W | 135 | U | 24-50 | 48.0% | 33 | 11 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 27 | 12 | 12/8/2012 | BROWN | 84-57 | W | -21.5 | W | | - | 34-68 | 50.0% | 42 | 3 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 32 | 12 | 12/15/2012 | *PURDUE | 81-68 | W | -7.5 | W | 124.5 | O | 26-53 | 49.1% | 38 | 12 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 33 | 15 | 12/17/2012 | IUPU-FT WAYNE | 74-62 | W | -21.5 | L | 132 | O | 29-56 | 51.8% | 37 | 13 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 34 | 11 | 12/19/2012 | KENNESAW ST | 85-57 | W | | - | | - | 32-52 | 61.5% | 36 | 11 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 17 | 10 | 12/21/2012 | NIAGARA | 89-67 | W | -15.5 | W | 141.5 | O | 31-50 | 62.0% | 41 | 11 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 29 | 5 | 1/5/2013 | SETON HALL | 93-74 | W | -9.5 | W | | - | 35-62 | 56.5% | 37 | 8 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 30 | 11 | 1/7/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/18/2012 | N CAROLINA A&T | 93-39 | W | | - | | - | 36-70 | 51.4% | 56 | 13 | 10-66 | 15.2% | 43 | 20 | 11/20/2012 | CAMPBELL | 91-72 | W | | - | | - | 32-64 | 50.0% | 50 | 14 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 28 | 13 | 11/23/2012 | *IOWA ST | 78-70 | W | -4.5 | W | 144.5 | O | 25-60 | 41.7% | 37 | 13 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 46 | 18 | 11/24/2012 | *OREGON | 77-66 | W | -4 | W | 146.5 | U | 24-64 | 37.5% | 44 | 15 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 41 | 19 | 12/1/2012 | ALABAMA | 58-56 | W | -7.5 | L | 130 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 32 | 11 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 16 | 12/6/2012 | ARK-LITTLE ROCK | 87-53 | W | -21 | W | | - | 34-71 | 47.9% | 39 | 17 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 32 | 32 | 12/8/2012 | MD-EAST SHORE | 92-60 | W | | - | | - | 36-75 | 48.0% | 55 | 15 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 31 | 13 | 12/15/2012 | *MARSHALL | 72-56 | W | -13 | W | 140.5 | U | 29-64 | 45.3% | 40 | 11 | 17-43 | 39.5% | 31 | 20 | 12/19/2012 | *XAVIER | 60-45 | W | -8.5 | W | 135.5 | U | 21-64 | 32.8% | 47 | 13 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 37 | 15 | 12/22/2012 | WRIGHT ST | 68-58 | W | -18.5 | L | | - | 26-68 | 38.2% | 49 | 10 | 19-59 | 32.2% | 38 | 11 | 12/27/2012 | NEW MEXICO | 54-55 | L | -6 | L | 136.5 | U | 20-64 | 31.2% | 40 | 11 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 35 | 14 | 12/31/2012 | @ PITTSBURGH | 70-61 | W | 6 | W | 125 | O | 21-51 | 41.2% | 37 | 9 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 32 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | ST JOHNS | 52-53 | L | -13.5 | L | 138 | U | 19-60 | 31.7% | 34 | 16 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 40 | 17 | 1/7/2013 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | @ DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NOTRE DAME: Any Mike Brey squad can compete, and this year's team has the potential to do way more than that with all five starters returning from a squad that finished third in the conference with a 13-5 record. Jack Cooley (12.5 PPG, 8.9 RPG) is one of the Big East's premier bigs, coming off an uber-efficient campaign in which he made 62.5% of his field goals and swatted 1.6 shots per game. But the backcourt figures to be just as dangerous led by Jerian Grant (12.3 PPG, 5.0 APG) and Eric Atkins (12.1 PPG, 4.1 APG). Both are strong passers and shooters, who should have no problem making this offense flow alongside 6-foot-8 swingman Scott Martin (9.5 PPG, 5.7 RPG). He is a matchup nightmare with a guard's skillset and a forward's body. Throw in some fresh blood with small forward Cameron Biedscheid and power forwards Austin Burgett and Eric Katenda, and this team has no shortage of talent in the frontcourt. | | CINCINNATI: The Bearcats hung around amongst the Big East elite last year, tying for fourth with a 12-6 conference record and reaching the Sweet 16. They bring back their leading scorer Sean Kilpatrick (14.3 PPG, 4.6 RPG), who averaged 2.5 three-pointers per game last year and isn't afraid to shoot the ball. Although the next two leading scorers'Dion Dixon and Yancy Gates'are gone, Cashmere Wright (10.9 PPG, 4.6 APG) is back to give this team a senior presence running the point. If fellow senior JaQuon Parker (9.4 PPG, 5.6 RPG) improves on his play from last season with increased minutes, this will be a nasty backcourt. It remains to be seen, though, if guys like Justin Jackson (5.1 PPG, 4.2 RPG), 6-foot-10 sophomore Kelvin Gaines and freshman Shaquille Thomas can step up in the post for Mick Cronin to make this team compete with the conference's best. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 9:19:21 AM EST. |
|
|