|
|
VIRGINIA TECH BOSTON COLLEGE |
|
| 135 | 52 Final 76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
731 | VIRGINIA TECH | +210 | 732 | BOSTON COLLEGE | -270 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-11 | -3.2 | 6-8 | 3-9 | 68.8 | 31.9 | 42.6% | 38.6 | 68.8 | 32.3 | 40.1% | 34.9 | Road Games | 1-5 | -0.9 | 3-3 | 1-5 | 60.8 | 25.8 | 39.4% | 38.5 | 73.5 | 38.3 | 41.0% | 38.0 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4.5 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 58.6 | 25.2 | 38.8% | 34.0 | 67.2 | 34.6 | 44.6% | 34.4 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -3.4 | 2-5 | 1-6 | 58.0 | 25.4 | 37.8% | 34.0 | 66.9 | 34.1 | 43.2% | 37.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.8 | 31.9 | 23-55 | 42.6% | 8-20 | 38.9% | 14-21 | 65.8% | 39 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 3 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.8 | 32.3 | 24-56 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 34.4% | 15-21 | 69.9% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 60.8 | 25.8 | 21-54 | 39.4% | 8-21 | 39.5% | 10-15 | 63.7% | 38 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 4 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.8 | 32.3 | 24-60 | 40.1% | 7-22 | 33.2% | 13-20 | 66.1% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 9 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 72.4 | 34.1 | 25-57 | 44.1% | 7-19 | 34.8% | 15-22 | 69.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.5 | 38.3 | 26-63 | 41.0% | 9-24 | 37.4% | 13-19 | 67.2% | 38 | 11 | 15 | 16 | 9 | 8 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-14 | -17.1 | 4-13 | 7-7 | 69.6 | 31.6 | 44.4% | 30.5 | 74.8 | 34.7 | 46.5% | 32.9 | Home Games | 3-5 | -9.2 | 0-6 | 2-2 | 71.9 | 32.1 | 46.1% | 29.7 | 72.2 | 35.0 | 47.0% | 30.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -4.2 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 62.4 | 27.6 | 42.5% | 29.2 | 68.0 | 35.0 | 45.5% | 31.6 | Conference Games | 1-5 | -5.2 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 65.3 | 29.0 | 43.7% | 29.0 | 71.3 | 36.2 | 47.2% | 31.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.6 | 31.6 | 22-50 | 44.4% | 8-23 | 34.1% | 17-23 | 75.2% | 31 | 7 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.2 | 32.3 | 24-56 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 33.2% | 14-20 | 68.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.9 | 32.1 | 22-48 | 46.1% | 7-21 | 35.1% | 20-26 | 77.2% | 30 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.8 | 34.7 | 26-57 | 46.5% | 6-16 | 36.7% | 16-22 | 74.7% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 9 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 71.9 | 33.9 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 33.4% | 16-23 | 69.7% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.2 | 35.0 | 26-54 | 47.0% | 5-15 | 36.4% | 15-20 | 76.1% | 30 | 8 | 9 | 21 | 5 | 9 | 1 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VIRGINIA TECH 73.4, BOSTON COLLEGE 74.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/2013 | *VA COMMONWEALTH | 52-82 | L | 11 | L | 146.5 | U | 17-48 | 35.4% | 44 | 27 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 38 | 7 | 12/28/2013 | UNC-GREENSBORO | 52-55 | L | -14.5 | L | 148.5 | U | 18-50 | 36.0% | 34 | 15 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 34 | 13 | 12/31/2013 | MD-EAST SHORE | 82-66 | W | | - | | - | 26-56 | 46.4% | 42 | 8 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 26 | 5 | 1/7/2014 | SYRACUSE | 52-72 | L | 11.5 | L | 134.5 | U | 18-49 | 36.7% | 25 | 8 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 41 | 7 | 1/11/2014 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 59-62 | L | 0 | L | 142.5 | U | 20-57 | 35.1% | 38 | 6 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 38 | 10 | 1/15/2014 | CLEMSON | 49-56 | L | 1.5 | L | 122 | U | 20-48 | 41.7% | 30 | 9 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 33 | 8 | 1/19/2014 | @ NOTRE DAME | 63-70 | L | 9.5 | W | 136.5 | U | 25-48 | 52.1% | 35 | 17 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 30 | 10 | 1/22/2014 | WAKE FOREST | 77-83 | L | -2.5 | L | 136.5 | O | 22-65 | 33.8% | 38 | 6 | 30-56 | 53.6% | 37 | 9 | 1/25/2014 | @ VIRGINIA | 45-65 | L | 16.5 | L | 123 | U | 14-42 | 33.3% | 29 | 12 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 34 | 9 | 1/29/2014 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2014 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/12/2013 | MARYLAND | 80-88 | L | 1.5 | L | 144 | O | 25-51 | 49.0% | 28 | 9 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 29 | 11 | 12/15/2013 | PHIL TEXTILE | 67-50 | W | | - | | - | 27-54 | 50.0% | 43 | 14 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 24 | 5 | 12/22/2013 | @ AUBURN | 67-77 | L | -1 | L | 147 | U | 20-46 | 43.5% | 34 | 13 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 26 | 7 | 12/28/2013 | *VA COMMONWEALTH | 50-69 | L | 7 | L | 148.5 | U | 17-44 | 38.6% | 36 | 23 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 34 | 11 | 1/1/2014 | @ HARVARD | 58-73 | L | 9 | L | 143.5 | U | 20-50 | 40.0% | 24 | 10 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 36 | 10 | 1/4/2014 | CLEMSON | 60-62 | L | -1 | L | 126 | U | 15-41 | 36.6% | 33 | 13 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 31 | 9 | 1/11/2014 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 62-59 | W | 0 | W | 142.5 | U | 22-51 | 43.1% | 38 | 10 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 38 | 6 | 1/13/2014 | SYRACUSE | 59-69 | L | 8.5 | L | 128 | P | 17-34 | 50.0% | 24 | 16 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 28 | 8 | 1/18/2014 | @ N CAROLINA | 71-82 | L | 12 | W | 144.5 | O | 21-48 | 43.7% | 32 | 18 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 29 | 12 | 1/21/2014 | GEORGIA TECH | 60-68 | L | -4.5 | L | 139.5 | U | 21-52 | 40.4% | 19 | 4 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 32 | 10 | 1/29/2014 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2014 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2014 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VIRGINIA TECH: The only positive for this Virginia Tech team is that it will be the second year for head coach James Johnson, but otherwise the outlook appears grim. Last year's leading scorer and ACC Player of the Year Erick Green is gone and so is Robert Brown, who transferred to UAB. And with an offense that may have to be centered around Jarell Eddie (12.3 PPG, 5.6 RPG, 40% FG) and Cadarian Raines (6.6 PPG, 6.4 RPG), this team appears destined for the ACC's cellar yet again. | | BOSTON COLLEGE: Despite finishing below .500 last season, Boston College made huge strides and should be able to at least reach the NIT, returning all five starters. Leading that crew is last year's ACC Freshman of the Year Olivier Hanlan (15.4 PPG, 4.2 RPG) while Ryan Anderson (14.9 PPG, 8.0 RPG) provides a steady post presence. This crew showed lots of potential last season, including a near upset of Duke, and won't be a fun team to play in conference season as an improving perimeter-oriented squad that likes to play four guards at times with Joe Rahon (10.1 PPG, 3.7 APG), Lonnie Jackson (8.7 PPG, 38% 3-pt FG) and Patrick Heckmann (8.0 PPG, 38% 3-pt FG) joining the two stars. Notre Dame transfer Alex Dragicevich (34% 3-pt FG in 2011-12) will be counted on for long-range shooting. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/20/2024 6:16:49 AM EST. |
|
|