|
|
MIAMI BOSTON COLLEGE |
|
|
| 60 Final 59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
733 | MIAMI | -8 | -6.5 | 734 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-3 | +5 | 10-2 | 0-8 | 67.8 | 28.7 | 44.5% | 36.3 | 58.4 | 26.9 | 37.2% | 35.3 | Road Games | 5-3 | +0.1 | 5-2 | 0-6 | 63.2 | 28.1 | 41.4% | 35.0 | 58.4 | 26.5 | 37.2% | 36.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.1 | 4-1 | 0-3 | 63.0 | 27.0 | 40.4% | 41.0 | 54.2 | 25.2 | 33.7% | 37.8 | Conference Games | 3-0 | +3.6 | 3-0 | 0-2 | 61.3 | 27.3 | 40.8% | 39.3 | 51.7 | 23.0 | 34.9% | 36.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.8 | 28.7 | 24-54 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 13-20 | 66.7% | 36 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 7 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.1 | 30.4 | 24-58 | 40.9% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 12-18 | 68.0% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.2 | 28.1 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-20 | 31.0% | 11-17 | 63.6% | 35 | 9 | 10 | 14 | 7 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.4 | 26.9 | 21-57 | 37.2% | 6-21 | 30.7% | 10-15 | 64.7% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 72.1 | 34.5 | 26-57 | 44.9% | 6-19 | 34.0% | 14-21 | 68.6% | 38 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 58.4 | 26.5 | 21-55 | 37.2% | 6-20 | 28.4% | 11-15 | 73.4% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 5 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 9-7 | -1.2 | 7-5 | 4-0 | 70.0 | 32.8 | 43.9% | 34.2 | 68.4 | 31.6 | 44.4% | 32.4 | Home Games | 7-3 | +0.4 | 4-2 | 1-0 | 67.7 | 32.3 | 43.3% | 36.1 | 64.1 | 31.0 | 41.2% | 32.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.4 | 3-1 | 1-0 | 76.0 | 34.4 | 45.4% | 32.8 | 69.2 | 31.2 | 46.4% | 31.4 | Conference Games | 1-2 | -0.6 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 77.0 | 32.0 | 44.0% | 32.0 | 76.0 | 31.0 | 50.3% | 32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.0 | 32.8 | 23-53 | 43.9% | 7-21 | 33.7% | 16-23 | 71.7% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.8 | 31.1 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 6-19 | 31.9% | 13-19 | 69.1% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 67.7 | 32.3 | 23-53 | 43.3% | 6-20 | 30.9% | 16-22 | 72.2% | 36 | 9 | 12 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.4 | 31.6 | 25-56 | 44.4% | 7-18 | 36.0% | 12-18 | 68.7% | 32 | 8 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 68.5 | 32.1 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 14-21 | 69.2% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 64.1 | 31.0 | 23-56 | 41.2% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 12-17 | 69.4% | 32 | 8 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MIAMI 75.2, BOSTON COLLEGE 71.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/28/2012 | MICHIGAN ST | 67-59 | W | -1.5 | W | 133.5 | U | 21-44 | 47.7% | 28 | 9 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 37 | 12 | 12/1/2012 | @ MASSACHUSETTS | 75-62 | W | 1.5 | W | 148 | U | 25-52 | 48.1% | 37 | 9 | 18-63 | 28.6% | 34 | 6 | 12/14/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 77-46 | W | -7.5 | W | | - | 27-56 | 48.2% | 43 | 12 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 40 | 16 | 12/18/2012 | @ UCF | 72-50 | W | -3.5 | W | 133 | U | 28-58 | 48.3% | 39 | 11 | 17-48 | 35.4% | 26 | 13 | 12/22/2012 | @ HAWAII | 73-58 | W | -10 | W | 138 | U | 27-56 | 48.2% | 31 | 8 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 34 | 16 | 12/23/2012 | *ARIZONA | 50-69 | L | 6.5 | L | 135.5 | U | 19-52 | 36.5% | 20 | 9 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 46 | 16 | 12/25/2012 | *INDIANA ST | 55-57 | L | -9 | L | 128.5 | U | 22-65 | 33.8% | 47 | 8 | 17-63 | 27.0% | 46 | 10 | 1/2/2013 | LASALLE | 76-59 | W | -6 | W | | - | 24-51 | 47.1% | 40 | 10 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 33 | 10 | 1/5/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 62-49 | W | -2 | W | | - | 22-53 | 41.5% | 40 | 13 | 17-52 | 32.7% | 29 | 12 | 1/10/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | 68-59 | W | 4 | W | 141.5 | U | 25-53 | 47.2% | 34 | 12 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 33 | 11 | 1/13/2013 | MARYLAND | 54-47 | W | -6 | W | 130.5 | U | 22-63 | 34.9% | 44 | 8 | 18-57 | 31.6% | 48 | 15 | 1/16/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/28/2012 | @ PENN ST | 73-61 | W | 1.5 | W | 125 | O | 19-45 | 42.2% | 38 | 12 | 19-53 | 35.8% | 33 | 13 | 12/4/2012 | HARVARD | 63-79 | L | -4 | L | | - | 25-43 | 58.1% | 21 | 15 | 28-51 | 54.9% | 24 | 9 | 12/8/2012 | ST FRANCIS-NY | 72-64 | W | | - | | - | 25-56 | 44.6% | 32 | 13 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 36 | 18 | 12/16/2012 | NEW HAMPSHIRE | 61-59 | W | | - | | - | 23-65 | 35.4% | 47 | 10 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 40 | 9 | 12/22/2012 | PROVIDENCE | 71-68 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 22-54 | 40.7% | 41 | 8 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 39 | 9 | 12/29/2012 | HOLY CROSS | 70-60 | W | | - | | - | 22-47 | 46.8% | 32 | 11 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 31 | 10 | 12/31/2012 | DARTMOUTH | 79-58 | W | -12 | W | | - | 27-56 | 48.2% | 36 | 11 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 29 | 11 | 1/5/2013 | NC STATE | 73-78 | L | 7.5 | W | 146.5 | O | 21-51 | 41.2% | 31 | 8 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 32 | 7 | 1/9/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 86-75 | W | 3 | W | | - | 29-60 | 48.3% | 33 | 5 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 34 | 17 | 1/12/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | 72-75 | L | 2 | L | | - | 20-48 | 41.7% | 32 | 17 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 31 | 12 | 1/16/2013 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2013 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MIAMI: The Hurricanes had some strong moments in Jim Larranaga's first year at the helm, including a win at Cameron Indoor Stadium, and they return four players from that squad. Three of their four double-digit scorers from last year are back in Durand Scott (12.9 PPG, 5.4 RPG, 3.1 APG), Kenny Kadji (11.7 PPG, 5.3 RPG) and Reggie Johnson (10.0 PPG, 7.2 RPG). Scott runs the offense but the keys to it are forwards Kadji and Johnson'at 6-foot-11, Kadji is a matchup nightmare with his touch that extends beyond the arc, while Johnson is a bull in the paint at 285 pounds. | | BOSTON COLLEGE: The ACC cellar dwellers last year averaged an abysmal 59.1 points per game (323rd in nation) and will need sophomore Ryan Anderson to take a big step in his second year of college ball after leading the team with 11.2 PPG and 7.4 RPG last year. Freshman Olivier Hanlan will be asked to run the point. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 2:28:58 PM EST. |
|
|