|
|
AUBURN ARKANSAS |
|
|
| 80 Final 88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
781 | AUBURN | | | 782 | ARKANSAS | -11.5 | -12 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-7 | -1.1 | 7-5 | 3-0 | 69.2 | 31.5 | 43.1% | 36.4 | 65.1 | 31.2 | 41.2% | 34.0 | Road Games | 2-4 | -0.1 | 4-2 | 1-0 | 63.2 | 28.7 | 42.7% | 31.2 | 67.5 | 35.7 | 44.8% | 33.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3.8 | 4-0 | 2-0 | 73.2 | 35.0 | 44.2% | 35.4 | 72.2 | 36.6 | 45.2% | 34.2 | Conference Games | 2-0 | +2.2 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 71.0 | 32.5 | 51.6% | 31.0 | 67.0 | 33.5 | 41.1% | 35.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.2 | 31.5 | 24-56 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 14-21 | 68.1% | 36 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.5 | 31.7 | 24-56 | 42.8% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 14-20 | 68.8% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.2 | 28.7 | 22-52 | 42.7% | 6-16 | 36.1% | 13-20 | 64.4% | 31 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.1 | 31.2 | 22-54 | 41.2% | 7-20 | 32.9% | 14-21 | 65.9% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.3 | 31.5 | 24-55 | 42.9% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 13-20 | 67.4% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.5 | 35.7 | 22-50 | 44.8% | 7-18 | 37.0% | 16-23 | 68.8% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-5 | -4 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 79.0 | 39.7 | 46.1% | 36.5 | 67.7 | 31.2 | 41.3% | 37.1 | Home Games | 10-1 | +1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 84.5 | 41.7 | 47.6% | 38.9 | 64.2 | 29.5 | 39.8% | 34.8 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 73.4 | 35.0 | 48.0% | 37.4 | 56.4 | 24.2 | 34.2% | 35.6 | Conference Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 53.5 | 22.5 | 42.3% | 29.5 | 51.0 | 20.0 | 31.6% | 40.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.0 | 39.7 | 29-63 | 46.1% | 6-18 | 31.5% | 15-21 | 69.3% | 36 | 11 | 16 | 20 | 9 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30.9 | 24-56 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 13-19 | 67.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.5 | 41.7 | 31-65 | 47.6% | 6-19 | 31.0% | 17-23 | 72.0% | 39 | 13 | 18 | 18 | 11 | 12 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.7 | 31.2 | 23-56 | 41.3% | 6-18 | 32.8% | 16-24 | 66.1% | 37 | 11 | 11 | 18 | 5 | 18 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69 | 32.6 | 25-58 | 43.0% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 13-20 | 66.0% | 36 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 64.2 | 29.5 | 22-56 | 39.8% | 6-18 | 31.3% | 14-22 | 64.7% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 20 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: AUBURN 68.9, ARKANSAS 71.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2012 | DEPAUL | 76-80 | L | 0 | L | 142.5 | O | 28-64 | 43.7% | 43 | 14 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 32 | 13 | 12/11/2012 | GRAMBLING | 92-42 | W | | - | | - | 34-63 | 54.0% | 39 | 12 | 16-51 | 31.4% | 28 | 24 | 12/15/2012 | FURMAN | 64-50 | W | -16.5 | L | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 42 | 12 | 16-52 | 30.8% | 29 | 8 | 12/18/2012 | TENNESSEE TECH | 81-62 | W | -9.5 | W | | - | 22-51 | 43.1% | 42 | 17 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 38 | 17 | 12/22/2012 | WINTHROP | 67-74 | L | | - | | - | 23-60 | 38.3% | 34 | 13 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 29 | 19 | 12/29/2012 | *ILLINOIS | 79-81 | L | 13.5 | W | 133.5 | O | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 20 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 31 | 11 | 1/2/2013 | FLORIDA ST | 78-72 | W | 4 | W | 136 | O | 22-63 | 34.9% | 42 | 9 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 40 | 20 | 1/9/2013 | LSU | 68-63 | W | 1.5 | W | | - | 25-54 | 46.3% | 38 | 12 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 40 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | @ S CAROLINA | 74-71 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 24-41 | 58.5% | 24 | 17 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 31 | 15 | 1/16/2013 | @ ARKANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | @ VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | OLE MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2013 | ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2012 | SYRACUSE | 82-91 | L | 8.5 | L | 153 | O | 24-62 | 38.7% | 35 | 14 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 19 | 12/4/2012 | OKLAHOMA | 81-78 | W | -5 | L | 152 | O | 30-57 | 52.6% | 26 | 13 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 31 | 17 | 12/8/2012 | @ MICHIGAN | 67-80 | L | 15 | W | 148 | U | 27-61 | 44.3% | 26 | 11 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 12 | 12/15/2012 | ALCORN ST | 97-59 | W | | - | | - | 37-79 | 46.8% | 47 | 11 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 33 | 24 | 12/20/2012 | ROBERT MORRIS | 79-74 | W | | - | | - | 31-59 | 52.5% | 41 | 14 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 33 | 16 | 12/22/2012 | ALABAMA A&M | 95-68 | W | | - | | - | 36-70 | 51.4% | 40 | 9 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 31 | 18 | 12/29/2012 | NORTHWESTERN ST | 79-61 | W | | - | | - | 32-71 | 45.1% | 57 | 14 | 17-62 | 27.4% | 41 | 14 | 1/5/2013 | DELAWARE ST | 86-51 | W | | - | | - | 32-55 | 58.2% | 31 | 10 | 18-47 | 38.3% | 26 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | @ TEXAS A&M | 51-69 | L | 1.5 | L | 137.5 | U | 22-52 | 42.3% | 27 | 12 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 51 | 10 | 1/12/2013 | VANDERBILT | 56-33 | W | -11 | W | 135 | U | 22-52 | 42.3% | 32 | 16 | 10-40 | 25.0% | 29 | 26 | 1/16/2013 | AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ OLE MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | MISSISSIPPI ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ S CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2013 | @ ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| AUBURN: The Tigers finished below .500 last year but undoubtedly took a step forward (four-win improvement) and finally have a glimmer of hope. In his third season, head coach Tony Barbee brings in two top recruits who should make an immediate impact in the SEC. Shooting guard Jordan Price has the physical tools to become a star at 6-foot-5 while small forward Shaquille Johnson is among the best pure athletes in the freshman class. And with last year's leading scorer Frankie Sullivan (12.6 PPG, 3.9 RPG) back in the fold, this team should be able to remain competitive in most conference games and not be completely embarrassed by the SEC elite. | | ARKANSAS: Mike Anderson struggled in his first year with the Razorbacks, going just 6-10 in the SEC following an early-season knee injury to the team's best player, Marshawn Powell, who scored 19.5 PPG in his two games. He's back in the fold this season though, and this team's potential rests in the success of his recovery, as Powell is the biggest 'addition' to this team without any impact freshman joining the squad. Also returning is BJ Young (15.3 PPG, 3.1 RPG), who proved to be a prolific scorer in Powell's absence but the depth in the backcourt remains suspect'Anderson lacks a true distributor, a necessity in his fast-paced offense. Young may emerge as an elite guard nonetheless, after making more than 50% of his field goals as a freshman, including 41.3% from three-point range. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/24/2024 4:58:29 AM EST. |
|
|