| | | |
STANFORD ALABAMA |
|
| 128.5 | 54 Final 66 |
|
|
| | |
|
NIT - Second Round | | | | |
531 | STANFORD | 130 | 128.5 | 532 | ALABAMA | -4 | -4.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 19-14 | -10.2 | 14-17 | 9-9 | 71.0 | 33.1 | 41.9% | 36.3 | 66.5 | 31.0 | 42.6% | 34.4 | Road Games | 7-9 | -2.3 | 8-8 | 8-3 | 71.2 | 33.1 | 42.3% | 34.7 | 70.1 | 32.6 | 44.2% | 36.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 75.2 | 34.8 | 44.6% | 32.4 | 69.4 | 32.0 | 45.7% | 32.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.0 | 33.1 | 25-59 | 41.9% | 7-19 | 36.0% | 15-20 | 74.1% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.7 | 30.4 | 24-56 | 41.7% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 12-18 | 69.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.2 | 33.1 | 25-59 | 42.3% | 8-20 | 39.6% | 13-18 | 73.4% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.5 | 31.0 | 24-56 | 42.6% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 14-19 | 72.1% | 34 | 8 | 11 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.2 | 32.6 | 25-55 | 44.7% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 13-19 | 69.8% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.1 | 32.6 | 25-57 | 44.2% | 5-15 | 31.8% | 15-21 | 70.3% | 36 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 22-12 | +1.9 | 15-15 | 4-16 | 63.0 | 28.8 | 43.0% | 32.7 | 58.5 | 26.2 | 40.5% | 33.3 | Home Games | 15-3 | +3.6 | 4-10 | 2-7 | 63.7 | 28.8 | 42.3% | 33.4 | 55.2 | 24.6 | 39.1% | 34.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 4-1 | 1-3 | 63.0 | 28.8 | 43.6% | 33.8 | 59.4 | 26.0 | 41.4% | 30.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.0 | 28.8 | 22-52 | 43.0% | 6-16 | 33.7% | 12-18 | 69.5% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.9 | 30.2 | 23-55 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 13-19 | 68.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 63.7 | 28.8 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 14-20 | 69.9% | 33 | 10 | 11 | 15 | 9 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.5 | 26.2 | 21-51 | 40.5% | 5-16 | 30.2% | 12-17 | 69.5% | 33 | 9 | 10 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.8 | 31.4 | 24-55 | 42.9% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 55.2 | 24.6 | 20-52 | 39.1% | 5-16 | 30.1% | 10-14 | 68.1% | 34 | 10 | 9 | 17 | 5 | 16 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: STANFORD 74.5, ALABAMA 76.1 |
| | |
|
|
2/3/2013 | OREGON ST | 81-73 | W | -9.5 | L | | - | 26-58 | 44.8% | 28 | 4 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 38 | 14 | 2/6/2013 | @ ARIZONA | 66-73 | L | 10.5 | W | 138.5 | O | 22-58 | 37.9% | 33 | 10 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 37 | 11 | 2/9/2013 | @ ARIZONA ST | 62-59 | W | 1 | W | 139.5 | U | 22-46 | 47.8% | 36 | 14 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 38 | 8 | 2/14/2013 | USC | 64-65 | L | -9.5 | L | 136.5 | U | 27-61 | 44.3% | 35 | 9 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 37 | 12 | 2/16/2013 | UCLA | 80-88 | L | -4.5 | L | 141.5 | O | 30-78 | 38.5% | 41 | 6 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 38 | 14 | 2/21/2013 | @ OREGON ST | 82-72 | W | -1.5 | W | 146 | O | 31-64 | 48.4% | 40 | 8 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 11 | 2/23/2013 | @ OREGON | 66-77 | L | 5 | L | 136.5 | O | 20-53 | 37.7% | 33 | 17 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 35 | 13 | 2/27/2013 | COLORADO | 63-65 | L | -5.5 | L | 134 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 33 | 12 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 34 | 9 | 3/3/2013 | UTAH | 84-66 | W | -12.5 | W | | - | 29-60 | 48.3% | 34 | 9 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 29 | 12 | 3/6/2013 | @ CALIFORNIA | 83-70 | W | 5.5 | W | 133.5 | O | 24-49 | 49.0% | 24 | 6 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 32 | 14 | 3/13/2013 | *ARIZONA ST | 88-89 | L | -3 | L | 133.5 | O | 36-78 | 46.2% | 38 | 12 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 36 | 11 | 3/19/2013 | SF AUSTIN ST | 58-57 | W | -7 | L | 125.5 | U | 21-52 | 40.4% | 33 | 13 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 29 | 10 | 3/23/2013 | @ ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2/2/2013 | @ VANDERBILT | 58-54 | W | -3 | W | | - | 19-50 | 38.0% | 27 | 9 | 19-39 | 48.7% | 31 | 17 | 2/6/2013 | @ AUBURN | 37-49 | L | -3.5 | L | | - | 14-49 | 28.6% | 30 | 16 | 15-44 | 34.1% | 35 | 14 | 2/9/2013 | LSU | 60-57 | W | -8.5 | L | 122.5 | U | 19-54 | 35.2% | 43 | 10 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 36 | 12 | 2/12/2013 | @ GEORGIA | 52-45 | W | -1.5 | W | 111 | U | 19-49 | 38.8% | 33 | 9 | 16-52 | 30.8% | 41 | 11 | 2/16/2013 | S CAROLINA | 68-58 | W | -12 | L | | - | 22-47 | 46.8% | 31 | 12 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 34 | 20 | 2/20/2013 | MISSISSIPPI ST | 64-56 | W | -15 | L | | - | 20-51 | 39.2% | 31 | 14 | 20-48 | 41.7% | 33 | 23 | 2/23/2013 | @ LSU | 94-97 | L | 1.5 | L | | - | 35-76 | 46.1% | 38 | 13 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 47 | 16 | 2/26/2013 | AUBURN | 61-43 | W | -11.5 | W | 120.5 | U | 22-56 | 39.3% | 41 | 11 | 15-50 | 30.0% | 31 | 15 | 3/2/2013 | @ FLORIDA | 52-64 | L | 15.5 | W | 119.5 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 31 | 11 | 20-45 | 44.4% | 33 | 10 | 3/5/2013 | @ OLE MISS | 83-87 | L | 5.5 | W | 134 | O | 29-66 | 43.9% | 41 | 17 | 27-49 | 55.1% | 25 | 9 | 3/9/2013 | GEORGIA | 61-58 | W | -7.5 | L | | - | 20-48 | 41.7% | 28 | 12 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 34 | 16 | 3/15/2013 | *TENNESSEE | 58-48 | W | 1.5 | W | 118 | U | 19-46 | 41.3% | 35 | 10 | 18-56 | 32.1% | 37 | 10 | 3/16/2013 | *FLORIDA | 51-61 | L | 11.5 | W | 117 | U | 19-42 | 45.2% | 28 | 12 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 29 | 4 | 3/19/2013 | NORTHEASTERN | 62-43 | W | -11 | W | 129 | U | 25-55 | 45.5% | 37 | 12 | 15-45 | 33.3% | 27 | 15 | 3/23/2013 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | STANFORD: Johnny Dawkins finally broke through with the Cardinal, boosting the team's wins by 11 and winning the NIT. Five of Stanford's top six scorers are back from that team, with only Josh Owens, who was third on points and first in rebounds, now gone. But Chasson Randle (13.8 PPG, 3.2 RPG, 2.1 APG) is back in the fold as a nasty shooter from deep (2.3 threes per game, 44% 3-pt FG). The offense is facilitated by fellow sharp-shooter Aaron Bright (11.7 PPG, 1.9 threes per game, 44% 3-pt FG). With forward Josh Huestis (5.3 PPG, 4.8 RPG) prepared to take a step up in his senior season, this team could very well be making some noise in the NCAA Tournament, not the NIT, this year. | | ALABAMA: The Crimson Tide made waves when they secured one of the nation's top recruits in 6-foot-7 Devonta Pollard who from the season's first game will be a threat on the open floor. Minutes won't be easy to come by on this team, however, with four starters returning. But Pollard's scoring presence will be critical on a team that will sorely miss JaMychal Green and Tony Mitchell's combined 27.1 PPG,14.4 RPG and 2.9 BPG from last season. The team still features Trevor Releford (12.0 PPG), however, who is not the best shooter (27% 3-pt FG). He is, however, a menace defensively with 2.0 SPG last year. He and senior Andrew Steele (6.6 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 2.7 APG) will form a solid backcourt, but the question is who will step up on the block. They possess two 7-footers in Carl Engstrom and Moussa Gueye, but neither has proven to be a force on the college level. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 11:18:21 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|