|
|
RUTGERS NEBRASKA |
|
| 48 | 17 Final 27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
349 | RUTGERS | 52 | 47 | 350 | NEBRASKA | -13 | -11 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -2.4 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 30.7 | 14.7 | 371.0 | (5.1) | 1.7 | 15.3 | 6.7 | 295.7 | (4.8) | 1.7 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.4 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 30.7 | 14.7 | 371.0 | (5.1) | 1.7 | 15.3 | 6.7 | 295.7 | (4.8) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 1-2 | -2.4 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 30.7 | 14.7 | 371.0 | (5.1) | 1.7 | 15.3 | 6.7 | 295.7 | (4.8) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 30.7 | 14.7 | 19.7 | 34:01 | 42-195 | (4.6) | 18-31 | 58.7% | 176 | (5.7) | 73-371 | (5.1) | (12.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.1 | 15.3 | 18.2 | 32:55 | 41-189 | (4.7) | 16-29 | 56.5% | 159 | (5.5) | 69-348 | (5) | (11.9) | Defense (All Games) | 15.3 | 6.7 | 14.0 | 25:59 | 32-93 | (2.9) | 15-30 | 48.9% | 203 | (6.8) | 62-296 | (4.8) | (19.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.3 | 14.1 | 15.3 | 28:05 | 35-110 | (3.1) | 17-29 | 58.9% | 210 | (7.4) | 64-320 | (5) | (14.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -4.2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 31.7 | 13.7 | 402.7 | (5.4) | 2.3 | 33.0 | 27.3 | 425.3 | (5.8) | 1.7 | Home Games | 1-1 | -3.2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 30.0 | 13.5 | 423.5 | (5.5) | 1.5 | 28.5 | 20.0 | 355.0 | (5) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -4.2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 31.7 | 13.7 | 402.7 | (5.4) | 2.3 | 33.0 | 27.3 | 425.3 | (5.8) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 1-2 | -4.2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 31.7 | 13.7 | 402.7 | (5.4) | 2.3 | 33.0 | 27.3 | 425.3 | (5.8) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 31.7 | 13.7 | 20.7 | 32:45 | 34-140 | (4.1) | 21-40 | 52.5% | 263 | (6.6) | 74-403 | (5.4) | (12.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 20.9 | 11.8 | 18.3 | 32:05 | 38-116 | (3) | 19-36 | 52.8% | 210 | (5.9) | 74-326 | (4.4) | (15.6) | Offense Home Games | 30.0 | 13.5 | 21.5 | 34:26 | 37-155 | (4.2) | 22-39 | 55.7% | 268 | (6.8) | 76-423 | (5.5) | (14.1) | Defense (All Games) | 33.0 | 27.3 | 22.3 | 27:15 | 32-123 | (3.8) | 29-41 | 69.4% | 303 | (7.3) | 73-425 | (5.8) | (12.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 41.4 | 27.8 | 26.1 | 28:55 | 40-185 | (4.6) | 25-38 | 67.4% | 303 | (8) | 78-488 | (6.3) | (11.8) | Defense Home Games | 28.5 | 20.0 | 22.5 | 25:34 | 26-83 | (3.2) | 30-45 | 67.0% | 271 | (6) | 71-355 | (5) | (12.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: RUTGERS 25.7, NEBRASKA 38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2017 | WASHINGTON | 14-30 | L | 28 | W | 55 | U | 42-131 | 24-35-178 | 2 | 24-84 | 17-30-284 | 0 | 9/9/2017 | E MICHIGAN | 13-16 | L | -6 | L | 51 | U | 30-128 | 17-38-198 | 2 | 35-114 | 19-37-260 | 1 | 9/16/2017 | MORGAN ST | 65-0 | W | -41 | W | 47 | O | 54-326 | 13-19-152 | 1 | 37-80 | 8-23-65 | 4 | 9/23/2017 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | ARKANSAS ST | 43-36 | W | -14.5 | L | 51.5 | O | 38-225 | 19-32-238 | 0 | 21-82 | 46-68-415 | 2 | 9/9/2017 | @ OREGON | 35-42 | L | 14 | W | 69.5 | O | 29-109 | 19-41-252 | 4 | 44-201 | 25-33-365 | 2 | 9/16/2017 | N ILLINOIS | 17-21 | L | -10.5 | L | 56 | U | 36-85 | 25-47-299 | 3 | 31-85 | 15-23-128 | 1 | 9/23/2017 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2017 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| RUTGERS: It's going to be tough to throw against Rutgers, but that doesn't mean that it will be hard to the Scarlet Knights. This team is still one of the weakest in the Big Ten, and that's not likely to change soon. | | NEBRASKA: The Cornhuskers no longer have the mobility of Tommy Armstrong under center, but transfer Tanner Lee is a good pocket passer. The defense should be a strength, so NU's success relies on the ability to score points. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/20/2024 12:35:27 AM EST. |
|
|