|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
383 | TULSA | 53 | 51 | 384 | NAVY | -5 | -4.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-8 | -5.2 | 4-6 | 2-7 | 23.3 | 9.9 | 375.5 | (5) | 2.1 | 29.4 | 14.5 | 411.1 | (5.7) | 1.7 | Road Games | 0-5 | -4 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 17.0 | 4.6 | 338.8 | (4.3) | 2.6 | 34.0 | 19.2 | 416.2 | (6) | 1.8 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 29.0 | 12.7 | 401.7 | (6.1) | 1.0 | 30.0 | 15.7 | 463.3 | (6) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 2-7 | -4.2 | 4-5 | 2-6 | 24.0 | 9.9 | 372.4 | (5.2) | 1.8 | 29.2 | 13.8 | 423.4 | (5.7) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 1-5 | -4 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 25.7 | 11.8 | 388.8 | (5) | 1.8 | 31.2 | 14.7 | 442.3 | (6) | 1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 23.3 | 9.9 | 20.1 | 28:31 | 49-211 | (4.3) | 13-26 | 50.2% | 165 | (6.3) | 75-375 | (5) | (16.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.5 | 16.9 | 23 | 30:25 | 44-205 | (4.7) | 19-32 | 59.0% | 238 | (7.5) | 76-443 | (5.9) | (13.6) | Offense Road Games | 17.0 | 4.6 | 19.8 | 30:18 | 48-168 | (3.5) | 14-30 | 47.0% | 171 | (5.7) | 78-339 | (4.3) | (19.9) | Defense (All Games) | 29.4 | 14.5 | 21.3 | 31:04 | 46-235 | (5.1) | 15-26 | 58.4% | 176 | (6.7) | 73-411 | (5.7) | (14) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 32.4 | 16.8 | 21.8 | 29:05 | 39-188 | (4.8) | 19-32 | 60.0% | 238 | (7.5) | 71-426 | (6) | (13.1) | Defense Road Games | 34.0 | 19.2 | 21.4 | 29:42 | 46-247 | (5.3) | 15-23 | 64.1% | 169 | (7.2) | 70-416 | (6) | (12.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-8 | -10.9 | 3-7 | 4-5 | 25.0 | 10.8 | 360.3 | (5.3) | 1.2 | 36.1 | 18.0 | 447.0 | (6.8) | 1.8 | Home Games | 2-2 | +0.1 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 31.5 | 19.2 | 437.7 | (5.8) | 1.2 | 28.7 | 10.5 | 423.2 | (6.9) | 3.2 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 15.3 | 1.0 | 296.3 | (4.9) | 1.3 | 40.3 | 25.3 | 510.7 | (7.3) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 2-6 | -10.9 | 1-7 | 3-4 | 25.5 | 13.1 | 360.6 | (5.2) | 1.1 | 35.2 | 16.5 | 423.6 | (6.7) | 1.9 | Conference Games | 1-5 | -3.6 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 21.5 | 8.8 | 340.2 | (4.7) | 1.3 | 33.7 | 15.7 | 438.2 | (6.9) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 25.0 | 10.8 | 18.8 | 34:21 | 59-296 | (5) | 4-9 | 42.6% | 65 | (6.9) | 68-360 | (5.3) | (14.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.3 | 15.6 | 21.6 | 32:36 | 43-200 | (4.6) | 18-31 | 56.5% | 216 | (7) | 74-415 | (5.6) | (14.2) | Offense Home Games | 31.5 | 19.2 | 22.5 | 39:02 | 64-340 | (5.3) | 6-12 | 48.9% | 97 | (8.3) | 76-438 | (5.8) | (13.9) | Defense (All Games) | 36.1 | 18.0 | 21.7 | 25:39 | 36-197 | (5.4) | 20-29 | 69.4% | 249 | (8.5) | 66-447 | (6.8) | (12.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 35.4 | 18 | 22.7 | 28:21 | 40-204 | (5) | 19-32 | 59.8% | 245 | (7.6) | 73-449 | (6.2) | (12.7) | Defense Home Games | 28.7 | 10.5 | 20.0 | 20:58 | 27-165 | (6.1) | 21-34 | 62.5% | 258 | (7.6) | 61-423 | (6.9) | (14.7) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 30.1, NAVY 34.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/20/2018 | @ TEMPLE | 17-31 | L | 6 | L | 54 | U | 66-208 | 22-41-195 | 5 | 36-191 | 8-21-109 | 2 | 10/4/2018 | @ HOUSTON | 26-41 | L | 17 | W | 71.5 | U | 57-199 | 13-31-227 | 3 | 41-312 | 19-27-165 | 3 | 10/12/2018 | S FLORIDA | 24-25 | L | 10 | W | 59.5 | U | 49-220 | 6-21-79 | 0 | 47-250 | 17-40-237 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | @ ARKANSAS | 0-23 | L | 7 | L | 54 | U | 40-133 | 8-25-127 | 2 | 53-196 | 11-19-131 | 2 | 10/27/2018 | TULANE | 17-24 | L | 2 | L | 48.5 | U | 35-135 | 12-26-180 | 1 | 55-312 | 10-19-92 | 1 | 11/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 49-19 | W | -19.5 | W | 59.5 | O | 57-470 | 9-14-168 | 1 | 50-255 | 14-28-232 | 3 | 11/10/2018 | @ MEMPHIS | 21-47 | L | 15.5 | L | 65.5 | O | 41-112 | 14-26-140 | 1 | 55-297 | 16-23-202 | 1 | 11/17/2018 | @ NAVY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2018 | SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/22/2018 | @ SMU | 30-31 | L | -6.5 | L | 58 | O | 78-349 | 1-4-25 | 3 | 37-158 | 24-32-166 | 1 | 10/6/2018 | @ AIR FORCE | 7-35 | L | -2 | L | 47 | U | 41-129 | 3-12-49 | 0 | 55-257 | 6-10-142 | 0 | 10/13/2018 | TEMPLE | 17-24 | L | 6.5 | L | 49 | U | 53-270 | 3-11-14 | 1 | 34-109 | 23-32-300 | 2 | 10/20/2018 | HOUSTON | 36-49 | L | 11 | L | 59.5 | O | 68-344 | 10-16-178 | 1 | 25-157 | 25-39-413 | 2 | 10/27/2018 | *NOTRE DAME | 22-44 | L | 22.5 | W | 57 | O | 48-292 | 4-12-52 | 2 | 43-254 | 27-33-330 | 2 | 11/3/2018 | @ CINCINNATI | 0-42 | L | 13 | L | 47 | U | 52-124 | 3-4-47 | 1 | 41-262 | 14-20-189 | 0 | 11/10/2018 | @ UCF | 24-35 | L | 23.5 | W | 69 | U | 63-374 | 0-2-0 | 1 | 52-297 | 17-21-200 | 1 | 11/17/2018 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2018 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/8/2018 | @ ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TULSA: After a 10-win season in his second year with the program, head coach Philip Montgomery was looking like a star in the making. But his momentum took a big hit with last year's 2-10 season, and it's hard to imagine the Golden Hurricane being much better in 2018-19. They still have some serious question marks at the quarterback position, which severely handicaps a strong group of skill-position players. Defensively, Tulsa was miserable at every level last season. It'll get some help in the form of transfers, but that's not going to improve the team as much as it needs. | | NAVY: Navy's defensive line probably isn't nearly as good as it needs to be for it to have the kind of success that would have it thinking about a conference title. But that doesn't mean the Midshipmen aren't going to be in the mix. Navy's triple-option running game will still be as potent as ever, especially with dynamic quarterback Malcolm Perry primed for a breakout year. Zach Abey is now a receiver, but you can count on the converted QB to be a factor at any position. Look for Navy to potentially spoil somebody else's title hopes somewhere down the line. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 8:40:48 AM EST. |
|
|