|
|
AKRON E MICHIGAN |
|
| 42 | 7 Final 27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
143 | AKRON | 44.5 | 41.5 | 144 | E MICHIGAN | -13 | -11 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-4 | -3 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 22.9 | 11.6 | 321.0 | (4.9) | 2.2 | 25.1 | 12.0 | 382.5 | (4.9) | 1.6 | Road Games | 2-2 | -1 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 20.5 | 7.2 | 302.0 | (4.7) | 1.0 | 26.7 | 14.5 | 415.5 | (5.3) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 22.3 | 12.3 | 342.0 | (5) | 2.3 | 23.0 | 11.3 | 385.0 | (4.6) | 0.7 | Turf Games | 3-3 | -2 | 1-5 | 2-4 | 21.8 | 13.3 | 326.2 | (4.9) | 2.7 | 23.5 | 9.7 | 367.3 | (4.8) | 1.3 | Conference Games | 2-3 | -2 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 18.0 | 10.6 | 304.0 | (4.6) | 2.6 | 26.8 | 11.6 | 402.4 | (5.1) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 22.9 | 11.6 | 17.4 | 28:20 | 34-111 | (3.3) | 16-31 | 51.0% | 210 | (6.7) | 65-321 | (4.9) | (14) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.4 | 13.5 | 20.6 | 31:41 | 40-159 | (3.9) | 18-31 | 57.9% | 217 | (7) | 71-376 | (5.3) | (13.7) | Offense Road Games | 20.5 | 7.2 | 15.5 | 28:39 | 34-111 | (3.2) | 15-30 | 50.0% | 191 | (6.4) | 64-302 | (4.7) | (14.7) | Defense (All Games) | 25.1 | 12.0 | 21.7 | 31:40 | 44-170 | (3.9) | 21-34 | 61.1% | 212 | (6.2) | 78-382 | (4.9) | (15.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.8 | 11.7 | 18.9 | 29:29 | 39-145 | (3.7) | 18-31 | 56.3% | 191 | (6.1) | 71-336 | (4.7) | (14.7) | Defense Road Games | 26.7 | 14.5 | 22.2 | 31:20 | 40-153 | (3.8) | 24-38 | 62.7% | 262 | (6.8) | 78-415 | (5.3) | (15.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-5 | +3 | 6-4 | 3-6 | 27.5 | 14.7 | 376.5 | (5.5) | 1.1 | 23.7 | 11.9 | 375.7 | (5.1) | 1.7 | Home Games | 3-2 | -0.6 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 28.2 | 15.0 | 340.0 | (5.4) | 1.0 | 22.6 | 8.4 | 334.2 | (4.2) | 1.8 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 27.0 | 9.3 | 334.7 | (5.2) | 1.7 | 21.3 | 9.7 | 312.3 | (4.3) | 2.0 | Turf Games | 4-4 | -1.5 | 4-4 | 3-4 | 29.4 | 15.9 | 374.2 | (5.4) | 1.0 | 24.4 | 11.2 | 366.4 | (4.8) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 3-3 | -0.5 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 27.0 | 16.2 | 382.8 | (5.1) | 1.2 | 23.5 | 11.8 | 355.0 | (4.8) | 2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 27.5 | 14.7 | 18.9 | 29:41 | 37-129 | (3.5) | 20-31 | 64.3% | 247 | (7.9) | 68-376 | (5.5) | (13.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28 | 14.7 | 20.4 | 29:13 | 38-152 | (4) | 19-31 | 61.0% | 228 | (7.4) | 69-380 | (5.5) | (13.6) | Offense Home Games | 28.2 | 15.0 | 17.6 | 27:06 | 33-124 | (3.8) | 19-31 | 62.7% | 216 | (7) | 63-340 | (5.4) | (12.1) | Defense (All Games) | 23.7 | 11.9 | 20.0 | 30:08 | 45-207 | (4.7) | 16-28 | 56.8% | 168 | (5.9) | 73-376 | (5.1) | (15.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 27.1 | 13.1 | 21.1 | 31:56 | 42-190 | (4.5) | 18-31 | 58.0% | 204 | (6.7) | 73-394 | (5.4) | (14.6) | Defense Home Games | 22.6 | 8.4 | 21.8 | 32:33 | 51-203 | (4) | 16-29 | 53.1% | 131 | (4.4) | 80-334 | (4.2) | (14.8) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: AKRON 27.4, E MICHIGAN 28.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/15/2018 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 39-34 | W | 21 | W | 47.5 | O | 36-90 | 17-28-277 | 1 | 36-86 | 37-58-405 | 3 | 9/22/2018 | @ IOWA ST | 13-26 | L | 19.5 | W | 47.5 | U | 31-91 | 12-28-153 | 1 | 35-132 | 26-34-233 | 2 | 10/6/2018 | MIAMI OHIO | 17-41 | L | -4.5 | L | 47 | O | 28-56 | 19-35-203 | 5 | 38-208 | 24-33-214 | 2 | 10/13/2018 | @ BUFFALO | 6-24 | L | 11 | L | 55 | U | 32-120 | 12-29-115 | 1 | 46-223 | 16-30-212 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | @ KENT ST | 24-23 | W | -5 | L | 49 | U | 39-143 | 19-35-219 | 1 | 43-173 | 17-31-198 | 0 | 10/27/2018 | C MICHIGAN | 17-10 | W | -4 | W | 43 | U | 37-154 | 10-27-149 | 4 | 49-131 | 19-39-169 | 1 | 11/1/2018 | N ILLINOIS | 26-36 | L | 6.5 | L | 37 | O | 28-35 | 21-38-326 | 2 | 61-296 | 21-28-188 | 1 | 11/10/2018 | @ E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2018 | @ OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/15/2018 | @ BUFFALO | 28-35 | L | 3 | L | 54 | O | 43-142 | 25-38-348 | 1 | 41-164 | 21-26-325 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | @ SAN DIEGO ST | 20-23 | L | 10.5 | W | 48.5 | U | 39-119 | 17-27-236 | 2 | 37-174 | 12-22-176 | 1 | 9/29/2018 | N ILLINOIS | 23-26 | L | -3.5 | L | 50.5 | U | 33-62 | 17-41-180 | 1 | 62-235 | 20-35-121 | 3 | 10/6/2018 | @ W MICHIGAN | 24-27 | L | 4.5 | W | 58.5 | U | 48-178 | 18-31-206 | 1 | 41-152 | 16-27-235 | 2 | 10/13/2018 | TOLEDO | 28-26 | W | 2.5 | W | 62.5 | U | 38-229 | 17-23-183 | 0 | 52-229 | 12-27-147 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | @ BALL ST | 42-20 | W | -2.5 | W | 45 | O | 49-163 | 22-28-257 | 1 | 32-227 | 21-39-157 | 2 | 10/27/2018 | ARMY | 22-37 | L | 1.5 | L | 48 | O | 11-34 | 19-29-201 | 1 | 73-289 | 7-8-126 | 0 | 11/3/2018 | C MICHIGAN | 17-7 | W | -14 | L | 46.5 | U | 43-137 | 21-33-212 | 3 | 32-77 | 12-32-61 | 4 | 11/10/2018 | AKRON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2018 | @ KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| AKRON: Led by two-time first-team All-MAC LB Ulysees Gilbert III, the Zips figure to field one of the MAC's better defenses this season. They allowed 26.3 PPG last year, but that number should go down with a more experienced unit. The secondary, in particular, will be a strength. Akron's biggest question mark comes on offense, where a lack of skill-position players could hurt them. The Zips are also a bit unsteady along the offensive line. They'll need contributions from unheralded sources. | | E MICHIGAN: Eastern Michigan should field one of the better defenses in the division this season. The Eagles had the second-best unit in the conference in 2017, and they return a lot of the talent that helped them do that'including defensive linemen Maxx Crosby and Jeremiah Harris, who combined for 17 sacks last year. The problem is that the passing game is miserable, so that defense might be spending a lot of time on the field. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 12:05:57 PM EST. |
|
|