|
|
CINCINNATI E CAROLINA |
|
| 69 | 19 Final 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
153 | CINCINNATI | -1 | 67.5 | 154 | E CAROLINA | 67 | -1.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 6-5 | -3.2 | 5-6 | 6-5 | 37.6 | 21.5 | 571.5 | (6.9) | 2.6 | 31.5 | 17.0 | 417.4 | (5.9) | 1.3 | Road Games | 1-4 | -4.2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 32.8 | 17.6 | 531.4 | (6.2) | 3.2 | 44.4 | 25.2 | 491.0 | (6.7) | 1.6 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 35.3 | 12.7 | 557.0 | (7) | 4.0 | 45.3 | 26.3 | 525.3 | (6.3) | 2.0 | Grass Games | 0-2 | -2.2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 25.5 | 10.0 | 385.5 | (4.7) | 3.0 | 51.5 | 30.5 | 505.0 | (7.5) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 3-4 | -4.4 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 38.1 | 19.0 | 616.9 | (7.5) | 3.1 | 34.7 | 18.1 | 431.6 | (5.9) | 1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 37.6 | 21.5 | 29.5 | 30:59 | 40-189 | (4.8) | 27-43 | 62.3% | 382 | (9) | 82-571 | (6.9) | (15.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.2 | 15.8 | 21.9 | 30:20 | 40-178 | (4.4) | 20-33 | 60.0% | 247 | (7.5) | 73-425 | (5.8) | (14.5) | Offense Road Games | 32.8 | 17.6 | 28.2 | 31:29 | 38-140 | (3.7) | 26-47 | 55.7% | 392 | (8.3) | 85-531 | (6.2) | (16.2) | Defense (All Games) | 31.5 | 17.0 | 19.9 | 29:01 | 40-202 | (5.1) | 18-31 | 55.8% | 215 | (6.8) | 71-417 | (5.9) | (13.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 27.9 | 13.9 | 20 | 30:37 | 39-155 | (4) | 18-32 | 58.0% | 240 | (7.6) | 71-395 | (5.6) | (14.1) | Defense Road Games | 44.4 | 25.2 | 22.0 | 28:31 | 45-240 | (5.4) | 17-29 | 58.9% | 251 | (8.6) | 74-491 | (6.7) | (11.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-6 | -2 | 5-6 | 5-6 | 28.5 | 16.0 | 416.9 | (5.7) | 1.7 | 26.6 | 13.8 | 398.5 | (5.5) | 1.4 | Home Games | 3-2 | +0.2 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 24.8 | 15.2 | 366.0 | (5.2) | 1.0 | 22.2 | 9.2 | 416.4 | (5.4) | 1.2 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -3.4 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 24.7 | 14.7 | 388.3 | (5.5) | 1.3 | 20.0 | 9.7 | 359.3 | (5.2) | 2.0 | Grass Games | 4-5 | -2 | 4-5 | 3-6 | 27.0 | 15.7 | 402.9 | (5.5) | 1.7 | 25.0 | 11.2 | 399.9 | (5.5) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 3-4 | -4 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 26.9 | 16.1 | 412.1 | (5.5) | 1.6 | 24.1 | 12.9 | 378.3 | (5.2) | 1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 28.5 | 16.0 | 21.5 | 28:30 | 35-141 | (4) | 26-38 | 67.8% | 276 | (7.2) | 74-417 | (5.7) | (14.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.4 | 12.9 | 20.1 | 29:05 | 38-174 | (4.5) | 19-32 | 60.1% | 222 | (7) | 70-395 | (5.6) | (15) | Offense Home Games | 24.8 | 15.2 | 18.4 | 28:29 | 38-138 | (3.7) | 22-32 | 67.9% | 228 | (7) | 70-366 | (5.2) | (14.8) | Defense (All Games) | 26.6 | 13.8 | 20.8 | 31:30 | 43-176 | (4.1) | 16-30 | 52.9% | 222 | (7.4) | 73-399 | (5.5) | (15) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.4 | 14.2 | 20.6 | 31:55 | 41-174 | (4.2) | 17-29 | 57.4% | 219 | (7.5) | 70-393 | (5.6) | (13.8) | Defense Home Games | 22.2 | 9.2 | 21.6 | 31:31 | 43-165 | (3.8) | 17-34 | 51.8% | 251 | (7.5) | 77-416 | (5.4) | (18.8) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CINCINNATI 30.5, E CAROLINA 31.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/1/2015 | MIAMI | 34-23 | W | 7 | W | 70 | U | 34-167 | 22-33-279 | 1 | 32-146 | 25-40-281 | 0 | 10/16/2015 | @ BYU | 24-38 | L | 4.5 | L | 68 | U | 46-121 | 16-31-220 | 0 | 29-197 | 19-32-252 | 1 | 10/24/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 37-13 | W | -10.5 | W | 58 | U | 49-285 | 26-35-327 | 1 | 30-136 | 17-41-130 | 2 | 10/31/2015 | UCF | 52-7 | W | -26 | W | 61 | U | 42-237 | 27-32-489 | 1 | 41-212 | 12-23-101 | 1 | 11/7/2015 | @ HOUSTON | 30-33 | L | 7.5 | W | 70.5 | U | 18-66 | 28-51-523 | 3 | 63-266 | 16-24-161 | 2 | 11/14/2015 | TULSA | 49-38 | W | -22.5 | L | 76.5 | O | 41-266 | 29-42-386 | 3 | 39-213 | 30-50-375 | 1 | 11/20/2015 | @ S FLORIDA | 27-65 | L | -1 | L | 66 | O | 35-97 | 28-51-333 | 6 | 53-361 | 13-20-200 | 3 | 11/28/2015 | @ E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/3/2015 | @ SMU | 49-23 | W | -5.5 | W | 64.5 | O | 54-306 | 19-26-249 | 2 | 30-40 | 20-38-289 | 0 | 10/10/2015 | @ BYU | 38-45 | L | 10 | W | 60 | O | 32-133 | 30-42-385 | 3 | 43-167 | 25-38-341 | 2 | 10/17/2015 | TULSA | 30-17 | W | -14 | L | 76.5 | U | 43-143 | 20-29-239 | 1 | 45-175 | 19-41-288 | 2 | 10/22/2015 | TEMPLE | 14-24 | L | -3 | L | 48 | U | 35-95 | 33-53-283 | 2 | 25-72 | 19-36-250 | 0 | 10/30/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 13-31 | L | -5 | L | 51 | U | 36-203 | 19-33-137 | 4 | 44-220 | 12-21-184 | 2 | 11/7/2015 | S FLORIDA | 17-22 | L | -5 | L | 55 | U | 34-62 | 14-23-158 | 0 | 60-242 | 12-23-200 | 1 | 11/19/2015 | @ UCF | 44-7 | W | -16 | W | 51.5 | U | 33-149 | 35-52-456 | 0 | 29-101 | 11-32-131 | 3 | 11/28/2015 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CINCINNATI: Offensively, the Bearcats will be the class of the American with star QB Gunner Kiel leading the attack. The defense has plenty of question marks though, and the conference schedule is not easy. Of the four opponents coming off winning records in the AAC, three will be played on the road (at Memphis, at ECU, at Houston) while newcomer Navy and conference doormats Tulane (3-9) and SMU (1-11) are not on the 2015 slate. Back-to-back midseason non-conference games versus Miami-Florida and at BYU will also be tricky. Cincinnati will likely reach a fifth straight bowl, but may not win the AAC title. | | E CAROLINA: There could be some growing pains with the new quarterback, so four road tilts in the first six games of 2015 is less than ideal. But that sets up four home games in the second half of the season and a trip to woeful UConn (2-10 last year). The final two games of the season (at UCF and versus Cincinnati) could determine the AAC title, since Memphis, one of three 7-1 AAC teams last year, is not on the Pirates schedule. The non-conference slate contains only one cupcake (Towson) plus games at Florida, at BYU and hosting Virginia Tech, but an ECU bowl berth for the ninth time in 10 years appears to be likely. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 12:47:41 PM EST. |
|
|