|
|
E MICHIGAN BUFFALO |
|
| 54 | 28 Final 35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
177 | E MICHIGAN | 49 | 54.5 | 178 | BUFFALO | -3 | -3 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-0 | +5.5 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 35.5 | 20.0 | 439.0 | (6.8) | 0.5 | 18.0 | 7.5 | 431.0 | (5.9) | 1.5 | Road Games | 1-0 | +5.5 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 416.0 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 19.0 | 12.0 | 476.0 | (7.2) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-0 | +5.5 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 35.5 | 20.0 | 439.0 | (6.8) | 0.5 | 18.0 | 7.5 | 431.0 | (5.9) | 1.5 | Turf Games | 1-0 | 0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 51.0 | 30.0 | 462.0 | (7.1) | 0.0 | 17.0 | 3.0 | 386.0 | (4.9) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 35.5 | 20.0 | 22.5 | 30:07 | 34-114 | (3.3) | 22-30 | 72.1% | 324 | (10.6) | 65-439 | (6.8) | (12.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 38.2 | 25.2 | 23.2 | 31:55 | 37-139 | (3.7) | 22-31 | 71.2% | 296 | (9.5) | 68-435 | (6.4) | (11.4) | Offense Road Games | 20.0 | 10.0 | 19.0 | 29:59 | 31-69 | (2.2) | 22-34 | 64.7% | 347 | (10.2) | 65-416 | (6.4) | (20.8) | Defense (All Games) | 18.0 | 7.5 | 21.0 | 29:53 | 38-264 | (6.9) | 20-34 | 59.4% | 167 | (4.8) | 72-431 | (5.9) | (23.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 20 | 8.8 | 22 | 29:05 | 34-229 | (6.8) | 24-40 | 61.2% | 201 | (5) | 74-430 | (5.8) | (21.5) | Defense Road Games | 19.0 | 12.0 | 19.0 | 30:01 | 42-341 | (8.1) | 14-24 | 58.3% | 135 | (5.6) | 66-476 | (7.2) | (25.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-0 | +1.6 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 42.0 | 23.0 | 390.5 | (5.1) | 0.5 | 19.5 | 5.0 | 315.0 | (4.5) | 3.5 | Home Games | 1-0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 48.0 | 34.0 | 354.0 | (5.4) | 0.0 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 275.0 | (3.8) | 4.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-0 | +1.6 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 42.0 | 23.0 | 390.5 | (5.1) | 0.5 | 19.5 | 5.0 | 315.0 | (4.5) | 3.5 | Turf Games | 1-0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 48.0 | 34.0 | 354.0 | (5.4) | 0.0 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 275.0 | (3.8) | 4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 42.0 | 23.0 | 24.0 | 32:40 | 39-153 | (3.9) | 22-37 | 60.8% | 237 | (6.4) | 76-390 | (5.1) | (9.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 37.8 | 23.2 | 23.8 | 33:25 | 38-153 | (4) | 23-36 | 65.0% | 232 | (6.5) | 74-385 | (5.2) | (10.2) | Offense Home Games | 48.0 | 34.0 | 21.0 | 29:39 | 37-154 | (4.2) | 19-29 | 65.5% | 200 | (6.9) | 66-354 | (5.4) | (7.4) | Defense (All Games) | 19.5 | 5.0 | 17.0 | 27:19 | 41-157 | (3.8) | 12-28 | 44.6% | 158 | (5.6) | 69-315 | (4.5) | (16.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 16.5 | 5.8 | 17 | 27:35 | 40-140 | (3.5) | 13-27 | 48.6% | 149 | (5.6) | 66-289 | (4.3) | (17.5) | Defense Home Games | 10.0 | 3.0 | 18.0 | 30:21 | 54-199 | (3.7) | 8-18 | 44.4% | 76 | (4.2) | 72-275 | (3.8) | (27.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: E MICHIGAN 16.5, BUFFALO 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2018 | MONMOUTH | 51-17 | W | -22.5 | W | | - | 38-160 | 22-27-302 | 0 | 34-187 | 27-45-199 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | @ PURDUE | 20-19 | W | 15 | W | 50.5 | U | 31-69 | 22-34-347 | 1 | 42-341 | 14-24-135 | 2 | 9/15/2018 | @ BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2018 | @ SAN DIEGO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | DELAWARE ST | 48-10 | W | -44 | L | | - | 37-154 | 19-29-200 | 0 | 54-199 | 8-18-76 | 4 | 9/8/2018 | @ TEMPLE | 36-29 | W | 4 | W | 52.5 | O | 41-152 | 26-45-275 | 1 | 29-115 | 17-38-240 | 3 | 9/15/2018 | E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2018 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | AKRON | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| E MICHIGAN: Eastern Michigan should field one of the better defenses in the division this season. The Eagles had the second-best unit in the conference in 2017, and they return a lot of the talent that helped them do that'including defensive linemen Maxx Crosby and Jeremiah Harris, who combined for 17 sacks last year. The problem is that the passing game is miserable, so that defense might be spending a lot of time on the field. | | BUFFALO: In 6'7", 245-pound quarterback Tyree Jackson and star wideout Anthony Johnson'who racked up 1,356 yards and 14 touchdowns last season'the Bulls have one of the best QB-WR duos in the conference. This passing game should be explosive, and Buffalo isn't going to have much of a problem running the ball either. Defensively, the Bulls are expected to be a force this year. They return most of a defense that allowed just 20.5 PPG in non-overtime games last season. There's some serious value in backing them to win the conference at +1000. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/26/2024 5:41:00 AM EST. |
|
|