|
|
N ILLINOIS
BOWLING GREEN |
|
|
57
| 48
Final
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 331 | N ILLINOIS | -14 | -14 | | 332 | BOWLING GREEN | 49.5 | 54.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 4-2 | +3.2 | 4-2 | 1-5 | 24.2 | 16.2 | 369.2 | (4.9) | 2.3 | 16.7 | 10.5 | 281.2 | (3.9) | 2.0 | | Road Games | 2-1 | +3.2 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 21.0 | 14.0 | 361.0 | (4.8) | 2.3 | 21.3 | 14.7 | 343.3 | (5.1) | 1.3 | | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 22.0 | 14.0 | 378.7 | (4.6) | 3.0 | 16.7 | 15.7 | 259.0 | (4.4) | 1.7 | | Turf Games | 4-1 | +4.2 | 3-2 | 0-5 | 23.4 | 16.6 | 357.2 | (4.8) | 2.0 | 13.2 | 6.4 | 284.8 | (3.8) | 2.4 | | Conference Games | 2-0 | +1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 19.0 | 14.0 | 353.5 | (4.4) | 2.5 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 257.0 | (4.2) | 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 24.2 | 16.2 | 20.5 | 29:22 | 44-168 | (3.8) | 19-32 | 58.9% | 201 | (6.4) | 76-369 | (4.9) | (15.3) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.3 | 17.9 | 21.3 | 29:23 | 42-202 | (4.8) | 18-30 | 60.8% | 213 | (7.1) | 72-415 | (5.8) | (14.2) | | Offense Road Games | 21.0 | 14.0 | 21.3 | 30:05 | 44-154 | (3.5) | 20-31 | 62.8% | 207 | (6.6) | 76-361 | (4.8) | (17.2) | | Defense (All Games) | 16.7 | 10.5 | 14.8 | 30:38 | 39-93 | (2.4) | 17-32 | 53.1% | 188 | (5.9) | 71-281 | (3.9) | (16.9) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 20.8 | 10.7 | 17.9 | 31:34 | 42-148 | (3.6) | 15-28 | 52.8% | 184 | (6.5) | 70-332 | (4.7) | (15.9) | | Defense Road Games | 21.3 | 14.7 | 14.3 | 29:55 | 33-84 | (2.5) | 19-34 | 55.4% | 260 | (7.7) | 67-343 | (5.1) | (16.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 1-6 | +1.9 | 1-6 | 2-4 | 21.0 | 10.7 | 375.1 | (5.1) | 2.0 | 36.3 | 21.6 | 515.6 | (6.8) | 2.1 | | Home Games | 0-3 | -3.2 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 26.7 | 12.7 | 424.3 | (5) | 3.7 | 39.0 | 20.7 | 440.3 | (6.1) | 1.7 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +5.1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 30.0 | 15.3 | 434.0 | (5.5) | 3.0 | 37.0 | 20.0 | 471.0 | (6.5) | 2.3 | | Turf Games | 1-4 | +2.9 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 26.0 | 13.0 | 412.4 | (5.4) | 2.4 | 34.0 | 20.4 | 493.2 | (6.5) | 2.0 | | Conference Games | 1-2 | +5.1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 30.0 | 15.3 | 434.0 | (5.5) | 3.0 | 37.0 | 20.0 | 471.0 | (6.5) | 2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 21.0 | 10.7 | 18.9 | 27:13 | 35-144 | (4.1) | 19-38 | 49.4% | 231 | (6.1) | 73-375 | (5.1) | (17.9) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25 | 13.2 | 19.7 | 29:54 | 37-146 | (4) | 19-36 | 54.0% | 233 | (6.5) | 72-379 | (5.2) | (15.2) | | Offense Home Games | 26.7 | 12.7 | 20.7 | 29:45 | 41-190 | (4.6) | 21-44 | 47.3% | 234 | (5.4) | 85-424 | (5) | (15.9) | | Defense (All Games) | 36.3 | 21.6 | 26.3 | 32:47 | 44-247 | (5.5) | 19-32 | 60.1% | 269 | (8.4) | 76-516 | (6.8) | (14.2) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 27.4 | 15.6 | 21.9 | 31:06 | 40-164 | (4.1) | 19-33 | 57.5% | 236 | (7.2) | 73-401 | (5.5) | (14.6) | | Defense Home Games | 39.0 | 20.7 | 21.7 | 30:15 | 45-242 | (5.4) | 13-27 | 49.4% | 198 | (7.3) | 72-440 | (6.1) | (11.3) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: N ILLINOIS 23.8, BOWLING GREEN 25.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/1/2017 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 20-23 | L | 3.5 | W | 46.5 | U | 35-164 | 16-39-203 | 1 | 50-148 | 26-42-191 | 1 | | 9/9/2017 | E ILLINOIS | 38-10 | W | -14.5 | W | 54.5 | U | 47-230 | 24-35-269 | 3 | 45-60 | 14-32-127 | 3 | | 9/16/2017 | @ NEBRASKA | 21-17 | W | 10.5 | W | 56 | U | 31-85 | 15-23-128 | 1 | 36-85 | 25-47-299 | 3 | | 9/30/2017 | @ SAN DIEGO ST | 28-34 | L | 9.5 | W | 46 | O | 46-160 | 24-40-269 | 4 | 36-127 | 10-20-136 | 0 | | 10/7/2017 | KENT ST | 24-3 | W | -22.5 | L | 44 | U | 50-152 | 13-22-114 | 3 | 43-102 | 6-17-29 | 4 | | 10/14/2017 | @ BUFFALO | 14-13 | W | -8 | L | 50 | U | 56-217 | 20-31-224 | 2 | 27-39 | 21-34-344 | 1 | | 10/21/2017 | @ BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2017 | E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/2/2017 | @ TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/9/2017 | BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/15/2017 | W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/2/2017 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 10-35 | L | 17 | L | 56 | U | 24-67 | 10-31-145 | 1 | 46-215 | 22-36-250 | 3 | | 9/9/2017 | S DAKOTA | 27-35 | L | -1.5 | L | 66.5 | U | 35-161 | 21-50-315 | 3 | 52-214 | 19-34-306 | 0 | | 9/16/2017 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 7-49 | L | 21 | L | 56 | P | 30-96 | 27-44-256 | 1 | 43-303 | 24-31-375 | 2 | | 9/23/2017 | @ MIDDLE TENN ST | 13-24 | L | 7 | L | 54 | U | 29-1 | 21-35-283 | 0 | 43-243 | 24-32-290 | 3 | | 9/30/2017 | AKRON | 23-34 | L | 3 | L | 58.5 | U | 41-181 | 24-38-195 | 4 | 40-178 | 14-25-183 | 3 | | 10/7/2017 | @ MIAMI OHIO | 37-29 | W | 16.5 | W | 51 | O | 41-275 | 12-26-230 | 1 | 44-238 | 24-43-374 | 2 | | 10/14/2017 | OHIO U | 30-48 | L | 9.5 | L | 61 | O | 47-229 | 17-43-192 | 4 | 43-335 | 7-22-105 | 2 | | 10/21/2017 | N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2017 | @ KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/7/2017 | @ BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/15/2017 | TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | N ILLINOIS: Defensively, NIU is going to be young up front. That means the team could struggle to stop the run. The Huskies are, however, good in the
secondary, which will help against pass-happy MAC teams. Offensively, the Huskies will go as far as the rushing attack takes them. | | BOWLING GREEN: Bowling Green's passing D made it too difficult to win games last season, allowing 273.3 YPG through the air (115th in CFB) and 32 touchdowns (t-125th in CFB) as well. If that can improve then this team might contend in the East Division. The Falcons have a potent ground attack. |
|
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 8:43:38 PM EST. |
|
|