|
|
W KENTUCKY BALL ST |
|
| 52.5 | 28 Final 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
321 | W KENTUCKY | 50 | 54 | 322 | BALL ST | -3 | -3 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 0-3 | -4 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 16.0 | 11.7 | 374.0 | (5.2) | 1.3 | 28.3 | 13.7 | 369.0 | (5.6) | 1.0 | Road Games | 0-2 | 0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 366.5 | (5.1) | 1.5 | 27.0 | 13.5 | 391.5 | (6.1) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -4 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 16.0 | 11.7 | 374.0 | (5.2) | 1.3 | 28.3 | 13.7 | 369.0 | (5.6) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 0-3 | -4 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 16.0 | 11.7 | 374.0 | (5.2) | 1.3 | 28.3 | 13.7 | 369.0 | (5.6) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 16.0 | 11.7 | 19.3 | 29:24 | 36-111 | (3.1) | 22-36 | 59.6% | 263 | (7.2) | 72-374 | (5.2) | (23.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 22.2 | 14.8 | 17.2 | 28:58 | 36-120 | (3.4) | 18-31 | 57.2% | 230 | (7.5) | 66-350 | (5.3) | (15.8) | Offense Road Games | 10.0 | 7.0 | 20.5 | 30:40 | 38-146 | (3.8) | 21-34 | 61.8% | 220 | (6.5) | 72-366 | (5.1) | (36.6) | Defense (All Games) | 28.3 | 13.7 | 18.3 | 30:36 | 39-193 | (4.9) | 13-27 | 48.1% | 176 | (6.5) | 66-369 | (5.6) | (13) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.7 | 11.1 | 19 | 32:52 | 41-189 | (4.6) | 14-27 | 51.5% | 183 | (6.8) | 67-372 | (5.5) | (13) | Defense Road Games | 27.0 | 13.5 | 20.5 | 29:19 | 38-219 | (5.7) | 13-26 | 51.9% | 172 | (6.6) | 64-391 | (6.1) | (14.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | 0 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 22.7 | 10.0 | 449.3 | (5.4) | 1.3 | 22.7 | 12.7 | 387.3 | (5.4) | 1.7 | Home Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 42.0 | 21.0 | 652.0 | (7.8) | 1.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 291.0 | (4.4) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 22.7 | 10.0 | 449.3 | (5.4) | 1.3 | 22.7 | 12.7 | 387.3 | (5.4) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 1-2 | 0 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 22.7 | 10.0 | 449.3 | (5.4) | 1.3 | 22.7 | 12.7 | 387.3 | (5.4) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 22.7 | 10.0 | 24.3 | 30:20 | 45-230 | (5.1) | 22-38 | 57.0% | 220 | (5.8) | 83-449 | (5.4) | (19.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.6 | 12 | 23.9 | 30:49 | 41-203 | (5) | 22-35 | 62.9% | 241 | (6.8) | 76-444 | (5.8) | (17.4) | Offense Home Games | 42.0 | 21.0 | 31.0 | 29:22 | 48-316 | (6.6) | 28-36 | 77.8% | 336 | (9.3) | 84-652 | (7.8) | (15.5) | Defense (All Games) | 22.7 | 12.7 | 20.7 | 29:40 | 41-182 | (4.4) | 18-30 | 60.4% | 205 | (6.8) | 71-387 | (5.4) | (17.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 20.4 | 13.7 | 21.2 | 30:11 | 43-191 | (4.5) | 17-28 | 61.0% | 173 | (6.1) | 71-364 | (5.1) | (17.8) | Defense Home Games | 6.0 | 0.0 | 16.0 | 30:38 | 38-174 | (4.6) | 14-28 | 50.0% | 117 | (4.2) | 66-291 | (4.4) | (48.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: W KENTUCKY 30, BALL ST 26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2018 | @ WISCONSIN | 3-34 | L | 35.5 | W | 52 | U | 34-124 | 17-30-181 | 2 | 39-234 | 17-31-257 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | MAINE | 28-31 | L | -10 | L | 50.5 | O | 31-42 | 23-41-347 | 1 | 41-142 | 12-29-182 | 1 | 9/15/2018 | @ LOUISVILLE | 17-20 | L | 23.5 | W | 54 | U | 43-168 | 25-38-260 | 1 | 38-204 | 10-21-88 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | @ BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | MARSHALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | OLD DOMINION | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2018 | C CONN ST | 42-6 | W | -20 | W | | - | 48-316 | 28-36-336 | 1 | 38-174 | 14-28-117 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | @ NOTRE DAME | 16-24 | L | 33.5 | W | 59.5 | U | 47-169 | 23-50-180 | 2 | 41-117 | 17-31-297 | 3 | 9/15/2018 | @ INDIANA | 10-38 | L | 15 | L | 62.5 | U | 39-204 | 14-28-143 | 1 | 44-255 | 24-32-202 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | W KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | @ C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| W KENTUCKY: The Hilltoppers couldn't run the ball a year ago, and not much will change in that respect this season. Western Kentucky has a porous offensive line, and there isn't anything special at the tailback position either. That means this offense is going to struggle to move the chains, even if there is some talent at wide receiver. As for the defense, the Hilltoppers' secondary'led by cornerback DeAndre Farris'is one of the best in the conference. But the team will struggle to stop the run, making it too easy for opposing teams to dictate play. Western Kentucky's easy schedule is the only reason this team has a chance of heading to a bowl game. | | BALL ST: Last season, the Cardinals averaged only 17.9 PPG, which was the ninth-worst mark in the nation. Don't expect that to happen again. Ball State was completely depleted by injuries in 2017, but both QB Riley Neal and RB James Gilbert are set to return to the lineup. The real issue for Ball State is on the defensive side of the ball, where the Cardinals will struggle to stop the run. In a conference full of potent running attacks, that's going to be a problem. Ball State will be more competitive this year, but it still won't win many games. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/8/2024 1:16:35 AM EST. |
|
|