| | | |
UCLA OKLAHOMA |
|
| 152 | 65 Final 75 |
|
|
| | |
|
BATTLE 4 ATLANTIS - Round 1 - Imperial Arena at Atlantis Resort - Nassau | | | | |
753 | UCLA | 154 | 152 | 754 | OKLAHOMA | -2.5 | -2 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 4-0 | +1 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 95.2 | 48.5 | 49.4% | 42.2 | 71.5 | 30.0 | 43.2% | 34.0 | Road Games | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | Last 5 Games | 4-0 | +1 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 95.2 | 48.5 | 49.4% | 42.2 | 71.5 | 30.0 | 43.2% | 34.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 95.2 | 48.5 | 32-66 | 49.4% | 9-21 | 42.4% | 21-31 | 68.0% | 42 | 14 | 20 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.2 | 36.8 | 24-57 | 42.9% | 7-21 | 31.7% | 19-26 | 72.6% | 37 | 11 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.5 | 30.0 | 25-59 | 43.2% | 7-23 | 31.2% | 13-18 | 72.6% | 34 | 7 | 12 | 22 | 6 | 16 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 66.2 | 29.1 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-20 | 32.1% | 14-22 | 64.1% | 36 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 8 | 17 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | -1.8 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 77.0 | 42.3 | 41.5% | 47.3 | 62.0 | 24.3 | 35.2% | 41.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1.8 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 63.0 | 35.0 | 35.5% | 44.0 | 65.0 | 24.0 | 37.5% | 37.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-1 | -1.8 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 77.0 | 42.3 | 41.5% | 47.3 | 62.0 | 24.3 | 35.2% | 41.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.0 | 42.3 | 28-68 | 41.5% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 11-16 | 69.4% | 47 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 73.2 | 33.9 | 26-60 | 43.9% | 8-21 | 39.2% | 12-18 | 66.8% | 39 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.0 | 35.0 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 44 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 4 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.0 | 24.3 | 23-64 | 35.2% | 6-26 | 23.4% | 11-17 | 62.7% | 41 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 9 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 69.4 | 32.7 | 24-60 | 39.5% | 6-24 | 25.2% | 16-22 | 73.5% | 37 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.0 | 24.0 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 8-26 | 30.8% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 37 | 6 | 11 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: UCLA 66.2, OKLAHOMA 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
11/14/2014 | MONTANA ST | 113-78 | W | -25 | W | 148 | O | 39-68 | 57.4% | 39 | 11 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 32 | 22 | 11/16/2014 | COASTAL CAROLINA | 84-71 | W | -16 | L | | - | 27-62 | 43.5% | 43 | 11 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 32 | 10 | 11/20/2014 | NICHOLLS ST | 107-74 | W | -27.5 | W | 150 | O | 38-68 | 55.9% | 49 | 13 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 33 | 14 | 11/23/2014 | LONG BEACH ST | 77-63 | W | -10 | W | 152.5 | U | 26-65 | 40.0% | 38 | 5 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 39 | 19 | 11/26/2014 | *OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/3/2014 | CS-FULLERTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/7/2014 | SAN DIEGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/10/2014 | UC-RIVERSIDE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/13/2014 | GONZAGA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/16/2014 | SE LOUISIANA | 78-53 | W | | - | | - | 29-75 | 38.7% | 49 | 10 | 21-64 | 32.8% | 47 | 20 | 11/19/2014 | @ CREIGHTON | 63-65 | L | -4 | L | 156 | U | 22-62 | 35.5% | 44 | 12 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 37 | 9 | 11/23/2014 | NORTHWESTERN ST | 90-68 | W | | - | | - | 34-68 | 50.0% | 49 | 20 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 39 | 17 | 11/26/2014 | *UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/5/2014 | MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/13/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/16/2014 | ORAL ROBERTS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | UCLA: If you are talking about pure talent, the Bruins deserve to be higher on the list. However, this is as young of a team as there is in the conference, who will look to replace five key players that helped UCLA reach the Sweet 16 last season. The top incoming freshman is 6-foot-9 PF Kevin Looney, who is relentless on the glass. He should work well with C Tony Parker (6.9 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 0.6 BPG), who has to become a more imposing presence down low. He is skilled and agile for his size, but he has to be more aggressive in his junior campaign. SG Norman Powell (11.4 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 53% FG) leads a thin backcourt. Powell came off the bench last season, but will likely be the team's leading scorer, especially early as the freshmen class adjusts to college basketball. He must become a better shooter (29% from threes), as opposing defense are going to pack it in a bit and make the Bruins beat them from deep, but Powell played very well in the 2014 postseason with 14.0 PPG. He will be joined by PG Bryce Alford (8.0 PPG, 2.8 APG, 39% threes) who is the son of head coach Steve Alford, and has similarities to his father in his intelligence and long-range shooting. | | OKLAHOMA: The Sooners have one of the budding stars in the conference in SG Buddy Hield (16.5 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 39% threes). The 6-foot-4 Hield is capable of scoring from anywhere on the court, and he becomes nearly impossible to guard when he is hitting perimeter shot. With Cameron Clark graduating, Hield will become the unquestioned No. 1 scoring option on the team. SG Isaiah Cousins (11.5 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 40% threes) will also be looked upon more as a scorer, and he proved last season he is ready for the opportunity. PF Ryan Spangler (9.6 PPG, 9.3 RPG, 58% FG) is the leading returning rebounder in the conference, which is huge for an undersized Sooners team. The team ranked seventh in the nation in scoring last season, but to take the next step in the Big 12, the Sooners are going to have to make some more stops on the defensive end, as they allowed 76.0 PPG (last in Big 12) last season. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 5:12:01 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|