| | | |
USC BOSTON COLLEGE |
|
| 133.5 | 75 Final 71 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
729 | USC | 131.5 | 132 | 730 | BOSTON COLLEGE | -7 | -7 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 6-4 | -2.9 | 5-5 | 4-3 | 67.9 | 31.0 | 41.4% | 39.4 | 66.6 | 31.9 | 39.6% | 37.2 | Road Games | 2-2 | +1.6 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 61.2 | 29.0 | 35.7% | 39.0 | 63.2 | 34.7 | 41.3% | 37.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 72.4 | 33.4 | 42.9% | 41.2 | 66.6 | 29.8 | 38.6% | 38.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.9 | 31.0 | 24-59 | 41.4% | 5-16 | 32.1% | 14-23 | 60.9% | 39 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.3 | 31.1 | 24-56 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 13-19 | 67.5% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 61.2 | 29.0 | 21-59 | 35.7% | 4-16 | 27.0% | 14-22 | 64.4% | 39 | 14 | 11 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.6 | 31.9 | 24-60 | 39.6% | 7-22 | 30.2% | 12-18 | 68.0% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 32.1 | 23-55 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 15-21 | 69.8% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 63.2 | 34.7 | 22-54 | 41.3% | 7-22 | 30.3% | 11-16 | 70.8% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 15 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-3 | +0.1 | 4-2 | 1-2 | 67.1 | 33.8 | 44.3% | 34.8 | 62.8 | 27.7 | 41.6% | 30.6 | Home Games | 5-0 | +1.4 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 70.8 | 35.4 | 45.9% | 35.2 | 58.8 | 28.0 | 39.5% | 28.8 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.4 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 69.8 | 35.2 | 45.7% | 34.8 | 61.8 | 31.2 | 41.9% | 27.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.1 | 33.8 | 23-52 | 44.3% | 5-19 | 26.4% | 16-23 | 68.6% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.9 | 31.1 | 24-54 | 43.8% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 12-19 | 66.5% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.8 | 35.4 | 24-52 | 45.9% | 5-18 | 29.3% | 18-27 | 65.9% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.8 | 27.7 | 20-49 | 41.6% | 5-16 | 28.7% | 18-25 | 72.1% | 31 | 7 | 11 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 66.8 | 31.2 | 23-54 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 30.3% | 15-22 | 69.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.8 | 28.0 | 19-49 | 39.5% | 5-18 | 29.7% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 29 | 6 | 9 | 22 | 5 | 16 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: USC 72.1, BOSTON COLLEGE 71.6 |
| | |
|
|
11/15/2014 | PORTLAND ST | 68-76 | L | -10 | L | 155 | U | 25-47 | 53.2% | 43 | 23 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 25 | 4 | 11/17/2014 | TENNESSEE TECH | 70-58 | W | -9 | W | | - | 21-47 | 44.7% | 33 | 17 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 42 | 16 | 11/20/2014 | *AKRON | 46-66 | L | -3.5 | L | | - | 15-53 | 28.3% | 39 | 16 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 41 | 12 | 11/21/2014 | *DREXEL | 72-70 | W | -1.5 | W | 121 | O | 29-59 | 49.2% | 22 | 9 | 23-44 | 52.3% | 33 | 21 | 11/23/2014 | *PENN ST | 61-63 | L | 6.5 | W | | - | 18-66 | 27.3% | 51 | 13 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 37 | 15 | 11/25/2014 | CS-FULLERTON | 53-49 | W | -5 | L | 140.5 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 41 | 13 | 18-56 | 32.1% | 39 | 17 | 11/30/2014 | @ NEW MEXICO | 66-54 | W | 9 | W | 128 | U | 23-60 | 38.3% | 44 | 9 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 38 | 12 | 12/3/2014 | LOYOLA-MARYMOUNT | 77-61 | W | -6.5 | W | 132 | O | 29-62 | 46.8% | 41 | 13 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 40 | 16 | 12/7/2014 | UTAH ST | 89-84 | W | -6.5 | L | 127 | O | 31-62 | 50.0% | 36 | 9 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 34 | 10 | 12/13/2014 | ARMY | 77-85 | L | -7 | L | 148 | O | 29-72 | 40.3% | 44 | 14 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 43 | 12 | 12/21/2014 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | VERMONT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2/2015 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/4/2015 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2015 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2015 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/14/2014 | NEW HAMPSHIRE | 58-50 | W | | - | | - | 19-53 | 35.8% | 35 | 11 | 15-49 | 30.6% | 39 | 19 | 11/16/2014 | *MASSACHUSETTS | 62-71 | L | 5 | L | | - | 20-57 | 35.1% | 43 | 18 | 20-41 | 48.8% | 34 | 15 | 11/20/2014 | *NEW MEXICO | 69-65 | W | 5 | W | 131.5 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 31 | 16 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 30 | 18 | 11/21/2014 | *W VIRGINIA | 66-70 | L | 8.5 | W | 141 | U | 25-46 | 54.3% | 30 | 21 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 34 | 14 | 11/23/2014 | *DAYTON | 53-65 | L | 5.5 | L | 132 | U | 17-50 | 34.0% | 33 | 17 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 33 | 12 | 12/1/2014 | MARIST | 79-61 | W | -14.5 | W | | - | 27-57 | 47.4% | 34 | 9 | 18-38 | 47.4% | 20 | 16 | 12/5/2014 | PROVIDENCE | 69-60 | W | 3 | W | | - | 24-48 | 50.0% | 41 | 14 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 28 | 10 | 12/11/2014 | MAINE | 85-74 | W | | - | | - | 29-54 | 53.7% | 27 | 7 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 30 | 17 | 12/14/2014 | BINGHAMTON | 63-49 | W | | - | | - | 20-47 | 42.6% | 39 | 17 | 13-43 | 30.2% | 27 | 16 | 12/21/2014 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/29/2014 | UMASS-LOWELL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2015 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | USC: Andy Enfield is in year two at USC, and the Trojans still have a long ways to go before they are competing for the Pac-12 title. The team lost three seniors, while also losing Byron Wesley, who transferred to Gonzaga. The team will rely heavily on swingman Katin Reinhardt, who transferred from UNLV. He averaged 10.1 PPG and 2.5 APG in his final season with the Rebels in 2012-13, shooting 89% FT and 35% threes, but his overall field-goal percentage was a subpar 36%. USC will also rely heavily on its incoming freshman class, as PG Jordan McLaughlin and SG Elijah Stewart will be asked to score immediately. The team is also excited about freshman swingman Malik Marquetti, and thinks that 6-foot-10 C Nikola Jovanovic (8.0 PPG, 4.4 RPG) will have a nice sophomore campaign. Look for the Trojans to push the pace on offense. | | BOSTON COLLEGE: While it does not seem likely that the Eagles have the talent to compete in the conference, the team does have one of the conference's best players in PG Oliver Hanlan (18.5 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 2.9 APG). He has tremendous size for a floor general (6-foot-4), and he is also fearless when driving to the basket. Hanlan is a great athlete, and if he is able to improve from the 3-point line (35%), he has a chance to become at least a 20-point scorer. SG Patrick Heckmann (6.0 PPG, 45% FG) and SG Lonnie Jackson (7.0 PPG, 38% threes) are two solid role players, but they will have to increase their scoring to open up driving lanes for Hanlan. One positive for the Eagles is that they have eight seniors on the team, which could play a big role in a conference that sees some of its top teams relying on a lot of freshmen. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 9:23:40 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|